Author:
Yani Mohammad,Krisnadhi Adila Alfa,Budi Indra
Abstract
AbstractEntity detection task on knowledge graph question answering systems has been studied well on simple questions. However, the task is still challenging on complex questions. It is due to a complex question is composed of more than one fact or triple. This paper proposes a method to detect entities and their position on triples mentioned in a question. Unlike existing approaches that only focus on detecting the entity name, our method can determine in which triple an entity is located. Furthermore, our approach can also define if an entity is a head or a tail of a triple mentioned in a question. We tested our approach to SimpleQuestions, LC-QuAD 2.0, and QALD series benchmarks. The experiment result demonstrates that our model outperforms the previous works on SimpleQuestions and QALD series datasets. 99.15% accuracy and 96.15% accuracy on average, respectively. Our model can also improve entity detection performance on LC-QuAD 2.0 with a merged dataset, namely, 97.4% accuracy. This paper also presents Wikidata QALD series version that is helpful for researchers to assess the knowledge graph question answering system they develop.
Funder
by Faculty of Computer Science of Universitas Indonesia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Information Systems
Reference38 articles.
1. Cyganiak R, Wood D, Lanthaler M. (eds.) RDF 1.1 Concepts and abstract syntax. W3C recommendation, Cambridge, MA, USA (25 February 2014). https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
2. Hu S, Zou L, Zhang X. A state-transition framework to answer complex questions over knowledge base. In: Riloff E, Chiang D, Hockenmaier J, Tsujii J, editors. Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Brussels, Belgium, October 31– November 4, 2018. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2018. p. 2098–2108. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1234
3. Yani M, Krisnadhi AA. Challenges, techniques, and trends of simple knowledge graph question answering: a survey. Information. 2021;12(7):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12070271.
4. Bordes A, Usunier N, Chopra S, Weston J. Large-scale simple question answering with memory networks. CoRR abs/1506.02075 (2015). 1506.02075
5. Steinmetz N, Sattler K. What is in the KGQA benchmark datasets? Survey on challenges in datasets for question answering on knowledge graphs. J Data Semant. 2021;10(3–4):241–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-021-00128-9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献