Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study sought to determine how institutional environments, including values, policies, and their implementation, shape inequities in scientific career progression for women and men, and their disadvantages in relation to their multiple social identities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The findings are drawn from a wider research study that was aimed at gaining an in-depth understanding of the barriers and enablers of gender-equitable scientific career progression for researchers in SSA. This was nested within the context of the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science in Africa (DELTAS Africa) programme—a health-based scientific research capacity-strengthening initiative.
Methods
The study adopted an exploratory qualitative cross-sectional study design. In-depth interviews (IDIs) with trainees/research fellows at various career stages supported and/or affiliated to three purposively selected DELTAS Africa Research Consortia were the main method of data collection. In addition, key informant interviews (KIIs) with consortia research leaders/directors, co-investigators, and the consortia management team were also conducted to corroborate information gathered from the IDIs, and also to provide additional insights on the drivers of intersectional gender-inequitable career progression. In total, 58 IDIs (32 female and 26 male) and 20 KIIs (4 female and 16 male) were conducted. The interviews were carried out in English between May and December 2018. The data were analysed inductively based on emergent themes.
Results
Three interrelated themes were identified: first, characterization of the institutional environment as highly complex and competitive with regard to advancement opportunities and funding structure; second, inequitable access to support systems within institutions; third, informal rules—everyday experiences of negative practices and culture at the workplace, characterized by negative stereotypical attitudes, gender biases, sexual harassment, and bullying and intimidation.
Conclusions
We contend that understanding and addressing the social power relations at the meso-institutional environment and macro-level contexts could benefit career progression of both female and male researchers by improving work culture and practices, resource allocation, and better rules and policies, thus fostering positive avenues for systemic and structural policy changes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Minja H, Nsanzabana C, Maure C, Hoffmann A, Rumisha S, Ogundahunsi O, et al. Impact of health research capacity strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: the case of WHO / TDR programmes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(10):e1351.
2. Vasquez E, Hirsch JS, Giang LM, Parker RG. Rethinking health research capacity strengthening. Glob Public Heal. 2013;8(1):1–18.
3. Daniels J, Nduati R, Kiarie J, Farquhar C. Supporting early career health investigators in Kenya: a qualitative study of HIV/AIDS research capacity building. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:1–8.
4. Vallentin A-L. Academic Careers in SET in the UK: The Gendered Experiences and Career Progression of PhD Students and Postdoctoral Researchers. TRIGGER Research Working Paper Series: Working Paper No.2. Birkbeck; (TRIGGER Research Working Paper Series). Report No.: 2. http://www.bbk.ac.uk/trigger/docs/TRIGGER_WP_02.pdf
5. Wellcome Trust. Wellcome Trust Basic Science Career Tracker Results of wave 6 (2014). 6. 2015.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献