Author:
Ngew Kok Yew,Tay Hao Zhe,Yusof Ahmad K. M.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common treatment modality for coronary artery disease. Accurate prediction of patients at risk for complications and hospital readmission after PCI could improve the overall clinical management. We aimed to develop and validate predictive models to predict any cardiac event within a year post PCI procedure.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the National Cardiovascular Disease (NCVD)-PCI registry. The data collected (N = 28,007) were split into training set (n = 24,409) and testing set (n = 3598). Four predictive models (logistic regression [LR], random forest method, support vector machine [SVM], and artificial neural network) were developed and validated. The outcome on risk prediction were compared.
Results
The demographic and clinical features of patients in the training and testing cohorts were similar. Patients had mean age ± standard deviation of 58.15 ± 10.13 years at admission with a male majority (82.66%). In over half of the procedures (50.61%), patients had chronic stable angina. Within 1 year of follow up mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and composite event of mortality and TVR were 3.92%, 9.48%, and 12.98% respectively. LR was the best model in predicting mortality event within 1-year post-PCI (AUC: 0.820). SVM had the highest discrimination power for both TVR event (AUC: 0.720) and composite event of mortality and TVR (AUC: 0.720).
Conclusions
This study successfully identified optimal prediction models with the good discriminatory ability for mortality outcome and good discrimination ability for TVR and composite event of mortality and TVR with a simple machine learning framework.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference36 articles.
1. World Health Organization., Global Health Estimates. https://www.who.int/data/global-health-estimates, 2020 (accessed 1 November 2021).
2. World Health Organization, WHO reveals leading causes of death and disability worldwide. : 2000–2019. https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of-death-and-disability-worldwide-2000-2019, 2020 (accessed 1 November 2021).
3. Planning, Development Division HIC. Health Facts. http://www.moh.gov.my/images/gallery/publications/HEALTHFACTS2014.pdf, 2013 (accessed 1 November 2021).
4. Lee KY, Ong TK, Low EV, Liow SY, Anchah L, Hamzah S, et al. Cost of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in Malaysia: a multicentre cross-sectional costing study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014307. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014307
5. Al’Aref SJ, Singh G, van Rosendael AR, Kolli KK, Ma X, Maliakal G, et al. Determinants of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: a machine learning approach. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e011160. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011160