Author:
Banouh Meriem,Armisen David,Bouguennec Annaig,Huneau Cécile,Sow Mamadou Dia,Pont Caroline,Salse Jérôme,Civáň Peter
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundBread wheat is a recent allohexaploid (genomic constitution AABBDD) that emerged through a hybridization between tetraploidTriticum turgidum(AABB) and diploidAegilops tauschii(DD) less than 10,000 years ago. The hexaploidization can be re-created artificially, producing synthetic wheat that has been used to study immediate genomic responses to polyploidization. The scale of the consequences of polyploidization, and their mechanism of establishment, remain uncertain.ResultsHere we sampled several synthetic wheats from alternative parental genotypes and reciprocal crosses, and examined transcriptomes from two different tissues and successive generations. We did not detect any massive reprogramming in gene expression, with only around 1% of expressed genes showing significant differences compared to their lower-ploidy parents. Most of this differential expression is located on the D subgenome, without consistency in the direction of the expression change. Homoeolog expression bias in synthetic wheat is similar to the pattern observed in the parents. Both differential expression and homoeolog bias are tissue-specific. While up to three families of transposable elements became upregulated in wheat synthetics, their position and distance are not significantly associated with expression changes in proximal genes.DiscussionWhile only a few genes change their expression pattern after polyploidization, they can be involved in agronomically important pathways. Alternative parental combinations can lead to opposite changes on the same subset of D-located genes, which is relevant for harnessing new diversity in wheat breeding. Tissue specificity of the polyploidization-triggered expression changes indicates the remodelling of transcriptomes in synthetic wheat is plastic and likely caused by regulome interactions rather than permanent changes. We discuss the pitfalls of transcriptomic comparisons across ploidy levels that can inflate the de-regulation signal.ConclusionsTranscriptomic response to polyploidization in synthetic AABBDD wheat is modest and much lower than some previous estimates. Homoeolog expression bias in wheat allohexaploids is mostly attributed to parental legacy, with polyploidy having a mild balancing effect.
Funder
Fonds de Soutien à l'Obtention Végétale
Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l’Environnement
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Shewry PR, Hey SJ. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. 2015;4:178–202.
2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT). Data - crops. 2022. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Accessed 21 Nov 2022.
3. McFadden ES, Sears ER. The origin of triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives. J Hered. 1946;37:81–9.
4. Zhou Y, Zhao X, Li J, Bi A, Kang L, Xu D, et al. Triticum population sequencing provides insights into wheat adaptation. Nat Genet. 2020;52:1412–22.
5. Zhao X, Guo Y, Kang L, Bi A, Xu D, Zhang Z, et al. Population genomics unravels the holocene history of Triticum-Aegilops species. BioRxiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.07.487499.