Author:
Yura Awangku Muhammad Iqbal,Newaz S. H. Shah,Rahman Fatin Hamadah,Au Thien Wan,Lee Gyu Myoung,Um Tai-Won
Abstract
AbstractAs most vehicles remain parked 95% of its time, this suggests that leveraging the use of On-board Units (OBUs) in parked vehicles would provide communication and computation services to other mobile and fixed nodes for delivery of services such as multimedia streaming, data storage and data processing. The nearby vehicles can form an infrastructure using IEEE 802.11p communication interface, facilitating communication, computation and storage services to the end users. We refer to this as a Vehicular Fog Computing (VFC) infrastructure. In this study, using NS-2 simulator, we investigate how six routing protocols consisting of two proactive routing protocols, Destination Sequence Destination Vector (DSDV) and Fisheye State Routing (FSR); two reactive routing protocols, Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR); and two geographic routing protocols, Distance Routing Effect Algorithm for Mobility (DREAM) and Location Aided Routing (LAR) perform when forwarding TCP traffic among the parked vehicles that form a VFC infrastructure in an urban street parking scenario. In order to reflect an urban street parking scenario, we consider a traffic mobility traces that are generated using SUMO in our simulation. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first effort to understand how vehicle density, vehicle speed and parking duration can influence TCP in an urban street parking scenario when packet forwarding decision is made using proactive, reactive and geographic routing protocols. In our performance evaluation, positive results are observed on the influence of parking duration in parked vehicles as TCP performance in all routing protocols increases with longer parking duration. However, variable speed in parked vehicles and moving vehicles in an urban street parking scenario may not have significant influence on TCP performance, especially in case of reactive and proactive routing protocols. Further, our findings reveal that vehicle density in a VFC infrastructure can noticeably influence TCP performance. Towards the end of the paper, we delineate some important future research issues in order to improve routing performance in a street-parked vehicle based VFC infrastructure.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Software
Reference50 articles.
1. Abdelgadir M, Saeed RA, Babiker A (2017) Mobility routing model for vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETS), smart city scenarios. Veh Commun 9:154–161.
2. Ali TE, al Dulaimi LAK, Majeed YE (2012) Review and performance comparison of vanet protocols: Aodv, dsr, olsr, dymo, dsdv & zrp In: 2016 Al-Sadeq International Conference on Multidisciplinary in IT and Communication Science and Applications (AIC-MITCSA), 1–6. IEEE. 2016@articlepaul2012vanet, title=Vanet routing protocols: Pros and cons, author=Paul, Bijan and Ibrahim, Md and Bikas, Md and Naser, Abu, journal=arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.1201.
3. Bates J, Leibling D (2012) Spaced out. perspectives on parking policy.
4. Bazzi A, Cecchini G, Menarini M, Masini B. M, Zanella A (2019) Survey and Perspectives of Vehicular Wi-Fi versus Sidelink Cellular-V2X in the 5G Era. Futur Internet 11(6):122. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/11/6/122. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11060122#.
5. Bazzi A, Masini BM, Zanella A, Thibault I (2017) On the performance of ieee 802.11 p and lte-v2v for the cooperative awareness of connected vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(11):10419–10432.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献