Abstract
Abstract
Background
The objectives of this study were to screen out cut-off age value and age-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.
Methods
We selected 45,974 CCRCC patients from SEER and 530 RNA-seq data from TCGA database. The age cut-off value was defined using the X-tile program. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between young and old groups. Hazard ratio (HR) was applied to evaluate prognostic risk of age in different subgroups. Age-related DEGs were identified via RNA-seq data. Survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between DEGs and prognosis.
Results
In this study, we divided the patients into young (n = 14,276) and old (n = 31,698) subgroups according to cut-off value (age = 53). Age > 53 years was indicated as independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) of CCRCC before and after PSM. The prognosis of old group was worse than that in young group. Eleven gene were differential expression between the younger and older groups in CCRCC. The expression levels of PLA2G2A and SIX2 were related to prognosis of the elderly.
Conclusion
Fifty-three years old was cut-off value in CCRCC. The prognosis of the elderly was worse than young people. It remind clinicians that more attention and better treatment should be given to CCRCC patients who are over 53 years old. PLA2G2A and SIX2 were age-related differential genes which might play an important role in the poor prognosis of elderly CCRCC patients.
Funder
the research start-up fee for the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
National Key Researchand Development Program of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Genetics,Oncology
Reference24 articles.
1. Ridge CA, Pua BB, Madoff DC. Epidemiology and staging of renal cell carcinoma. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31(01):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1363837.
2. Liu K, Wang P, Zhu X, Bei Y, Zheng Z, Yan S. Disparities of age-based cancer-specific survival improvement with various clinicopathologic characteristics for kidney cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:2259–68. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169192.
3. Takada S, Namiki M, Takahara S, Matsumiya K, Kondoh N, Kokado Y, et al. Serum HGF levels in acute renal rejection after living related renal transplantation. Transpl Int. 1996;9(2):151–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.1996.tb00870.x.
4. Meehan B, Appu S, St Croix B, Rak-Poznanska K, Klotz L, Rak J. Age-related properties of the tumour vasculature in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011;107(3):416–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09569.x.
5. Al-Janabi O, Wach S, Nolte E, et al. Piwi-like 1 and 4 gene transcript levels are associated with clinicopathological parameters in renal cell carcinomas. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1842;2014:686–90.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献