Interventions supporting cancer patients in making decisions regarding participation in clinical trials - a systematic review

Author:

Hillersdal LineORCID,Nielsen Zandra EngelbakORCID,Nørmark Ane Taudorf,Knoop Ann,Piil KarinORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Existing research on the perspectives of patients with cancer and health care professionals indicates that patient decision making on cancer clinical trial participation is a complex process and may be poorly understood, possibly compromising their decision to participate. This systematic review investigates interventions that support patients in their decision-making processes regarding whether to participate or not and assesses the qualities of the interventions, measures used and related outcomes. Methods Six databases were systematically searched and only studies evaluating interventions that support the decision making of adult patients offered to enter a cancer clinical trial were included. Ten articles met the criteria and were analysed using a narrative synthesis approach. Results The research focus of the included studies reflected the multifactorial nature of what constitutes support for patient decision making in terms of entering a cancer clinical trial. However, most interventions were based on the hypothesis that more information leads to support in decision making, and did not take other factors, such as the relationship to the clinical staff or relatives, the patients’ strong hope for therapeutic benefit or other existential needs into account. The interventions were primarily based on a specific tool, executed once, which seems to imply that decisions need only to be supported once and not at several time points throughout the decision process, and did not assess the importance of a patient’s family- or social relations. Moreover, few interventions focused on the patients’ counselling experience or assessed patient preferences in relation to decision making. Conclusions The findings demonstrate a lack of research on interventions to support patients’ decision making that takes other factors, apart from improving knowledge of trials, into account. Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of decision support interventions to improve the experience of support in adult patients with cancer. Interventions that take patient preferences in relation to decision making and the social context of decision processes into account need to be developed and assessed.

Funder

Danish Cancer Society

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Genetics,Oncology

Reference47 articles.

1. National Institutes of Health. Clinical trials: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2021. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Accessed 3 Nov 2021

2. Agency TDM. Report for clinical trials in 2019. 2021. Available from: https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/udgivelser/2020/aarsrapport-for-kliniske-forsoeg-i-2019/. Accessed 3 Nov 2021.

3. Administration USFaD. The drug development process – step 3: clinical research. 2018. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/ForPatients/Approvals/Drugs/ucm405622.htm#Clinical_Research_Phase_Studies. Accessed 3 Nov 2021.

4. Research UC. About cancer: phases of clinical trials. 2015. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/find-a-clinical-trial/what-clinical-trials-are/phases-of-clinical-trials#phase1. Accessed 3 Nov 2021.

5. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S. Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implement Sci. 2009;4:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-75 [published Online First: 2009/11/20].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3