Promoting informed approaches in precision oncology and clinical trial participation for Black patients with cancer: Community‐engaged development and pilot testing of a digital intervention

Author:

An Jinghua1ORCID,Ferrante Jeanne M.12,Macenat Myneka1,Ganesan Shridar1,Hudson Shawna V.12,Omene Coral12,Garcia Harold3,Kinney Anita Y.14

Affiliation:

1. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA

2. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA

3. Lawrence Herbert School of Communication Hofstra University Hempstead New York USA

4. School of Public Health The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBlack patients with cancer are less likely to receive precision cancer treatments than White patients and are underrepresented in clinical trials. To address these disparities, the study aimed to develop and pilot‐test a digital intervention to improve Black patients’ knowledge about precision oncology and clinical trials, empower patients to increase relevant discussion, and promote informed decision‐making.MethodsA community‐engaged approach, including a Community Advisory Board and two rounds of key informant interviews with Black patients with cancer, their relatives, and providers (n = 48) was used to develop and refine the multimedia digital intervention. Thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. The intervention was then pilot‐tested with 30 Black patients with cancer to assess feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, knowledge, decision self‐efficacy, and patient empowerment; Wilcoxon matched pairs signed‐rank test was used to analyze quantitative data.ResultsThe digital tool was found to be feasible, acceptable, and culturally appropriate. Key informants shared their preferences and recommendations for the digital intervention and helped improve cultural appropriateness through user and usability testing. In the pilot test, appreciable improvement was found in participants’ knowledge about precision oncology (z = –2.04, p = .052), knowledge about clinical trials (z = –3.14, p = .001), and decisional self‐efficacy for targeted/immune therapy (z = –1.96, p = .0495).ConclusionsThe digital intervention could be a promising interactive decision‐support tool for increasing Black patients’ participation in clinical trials and receipt of precision treatments, including immunotherapy. Its use in clinical practice may reduce disparities in oncology care and research.Plain Language Summary We developed a digital interactive decision support tool for Black patients with cancer by convening a Community Advisory Board and conducting interviews with Black patients with cancer, their relatives, and providers. We then pilot‐tested the intervention with newly diagnosed Black patients with cancer and found appreciable improvement in participants’ knowledge about precision oncology, knowledge about clinical trials, and confidence in making decisions for targeted/immune therapy. Our digital tool has great potential to be an affordable and scalable solution for empowering and educating Black patients with cancer to help them make informed decisions about precision oncology and clinical trials and ultimately reducing racial disparities.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference46 articles.

1. Racial disparities in guideline-concordant cancer care and mortality in the United States

2. American Cancer Society.Cancer facts & figures for African American/Black People 2022‐2024.https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer‐facts‐statistics/cancer‐facts‐figures‐for‐african‐americans.html

3. Racial disparities in the molecular landscape of cancer;Heath EI;Anticancer Res,2018

4. Racial disparities in prostate cancer: A complex interplay between socioeconomic inequities and genomics

5. A perfect storm: How tumor biology, genomics, and health care delivery patterns collide to create a racial survival disparity in breast cancer and proposed interventions for change

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3