An empirical model for estimating daily atmospheric column-averaged CO2 concentration above São Paulo state, Brazil
-
Published:2022-06-11
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:
-
ISSN:1750-0680
-
Container-title:Carbon Balance and Management
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Carbon Balance Manage
Author:
da Costa Luis MiguelORCID, de Araújo Santos Gustavo André, Panosso Alan Rodrigo, de Souza Rolim Glauco, La Scala Newton
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The recent studies of the variations in the atmospheric column-averaged CO2 concentration ($${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$
X
CO
2
) above croplands and forests show a negative correlation between $${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$
X
CO
2
and Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and confirmed that photosynthesis is the main regulator of the terrestrial uptake for atmospheric CO2. The remote sensing techniques in this context are very important to observe this relation, however, there is still a time gap in orbital data, since the observation is not daily. Here we analyzed the effects of several variables related to the photosynthetic capacity of vegetation on $${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$
X
CO
2
above São Paulo state during the period from 2015 to 2019 and propose a daily model to estimate the natural changes in atmospheric CO2.
Results
The data retrieved from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), NASA-POWER and Application for Extracting and Exploring Analysis Ready Samples (AppEEARS) show that Global Radiation (Qg), Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and, Relative Humidity (RH) are the most significant factors for predicting the annual $${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$
X
CO
2
cycle. The daily model of $${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$
X
CO
2
estimated from Qg and RH predicts daily $${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$
X
CO
2
with root mean squared error of 0.47 ppm (the coefficient of determination is equal to 0.44, p < 0.01).
Conclusion
The obtained results imply that a significant part of daily $${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$
X
CO
2
variations could be explained by meteorological factors and that further research should be done to quantify the effects of the atmospheric transport and anthropogenic emissions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Global and Planetary Change
Reference74 articles.
1. Eldering A, O’Dell CW, Wennberg PO, Crisp D, Gunson MR, Viatte C, Avis C, Braverman A, Castano R, Chang A, Chapsky L, Cheng C, Connor B, Dang L, Doran G, Fisher B, Frankenberg C, Fu D, Granat R, Hobbs J, Lee RAM, Mandrake L, McDuffie J, Miller CE, Myers V, Natraj V, O’Brien D, Osterman GB, Oyafuso F, Payne VH, Pollock HR, Polonsky I, Roehl CM, Rosenberg R, Schwandner F, Smyth M, Tang V, Taylor TE, To C, Wunch D, Yoshimizu J. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: first 18 months of science data products. Atmos Meas Tech. 2017;10:549–63. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-549-2017. 2. Boesch H, Baker D, Connor B, Crisp D, Miller C. Global characterization of CO2 column retrievals from shortwave-infrared satellite observations of the orbiting carbon observatory-2 mission. Remote Sensing. 2011;3(2):270–304. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS3020270. 3. Ye X, Lauvaux T, Kort EA, Oda T, Feng S, Lin JC, Yang EG, Wu D. Constraining fossil fuel CO2 emissions from urban area using OCO-2 observations of total column CO2. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2020;125(8): e2019JD030528. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030528. 4. Kort EA, Frankenberg C, Miller CE, Oda T. Space-based observations of megacity carbon dioxide. Geophys Res Lett. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052738. 5. Parazoo NC, Bowman K, Frankenberg C, Lee JE, Fisher JB, Worden J, Jones DBA, Berry J, Collatz GJ, Baker IT, Jung M, Liu J, Osterman G, O’Dell C, Sparks A, Butz A, Guerlet S, Yoshida Y, Chen H, Gerbig C. Interpreting seasonal changes in the carbon balance of southern Amazonia using measurements of $${\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}$$ and chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40(11):2829–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50452.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|