Abstract
AbstractVirtual screening has significantly improved the success rate of early stage drug discovery. Recent virtual screening methods have improved owing to advances in machine learning and chemical information. Among these advances, the creative extraction of drug features is important for predicting drug–target interaction (DTI), which is a large-scale virtual screening of known drugs. Herein, we report Kullback–Leibler divergence (KLD) as a DTI feature and the feature-driven classification model applicable to DTI prediction. For the purpose, E3FP three-dimensional (3D) molecular fingerprints of drugs as a molecular representation allow the computation of 3D similarities between ligands within each target (Q–Q matrix) to identify the uniqueness of pharmacological targets and those between a query and a ligand (Q–L vector) in DTIs. The 3D similarity matrices are transformed into probability density functions via kernel density estimation as a nonparametric estimation. Each density model can exploit the characteristics of each pharmacological target and measure the quasi-distance between the ligands. Furthermore, we developed a random forest model from the KLD feature vectors to successfully predict DTIs for representative 17 targets (mean accuracy: 0.882, out-of-bag score estimate: 0.876, ROC AUC: 0.990). The method is applicable for 2D chemical similarity.
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Computer Science Applications
Reference59 articles.
1. Svava ÓJ, Flemming SJ, Søren B (2013) Prediction methods and databases within chemoinformatics: emphasis on drugs and drug candidates. Bioinformatics 21(10):2145–2160
2. Nigsch F, Bender A, Jenkins JL, Mitchell JBO (2008) Ligand-target prediction using Winnow and naive Bayesian algorithms and the implications of overall performance statistics. J Chem Inf Model 48:2313–2325
3. Ma J, Sheridan RP, Liaw A, Dahl GE, Svetnik V (2015) Deep neural nets as a method for quantitative structure–activity relationships. J Chem Inf Model 55:263–274
4. Weininger D (1988) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Computer Sci 28(1):31–36
5. Keiser MJ, Setola V, Irwin JJ, Laggner C, Abbas AI, Hufeisen SJ, Jensen NH, Kuijer MB, Matos RC, Tran TB, Whaley R, Glennon RA, Hert J, Thomas KLH, Edwards DD, Shoichet BK, Roth BL (2009) Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature 462:175–181
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献