Author:
Ochomo Eric,Rund Samuel S. C.,Mthawanji Rosheen S.,Antonio-Nkondjio Christophe,Machani Maxwell,Samake Siriman,Wolie Rosine Z.,Nsango Sandrine,Lown Laurel Anne,Matoke-Muhia Damaris,Kamau Luna,Lukyamuzi Edward,Njeri Jane,Chabi Joseph,Akrofi Otubea Owusu,Ntege Charles,Mero Victor,Mwalimu Charles,Kiware Samson,Bilgo Etienne,Traoré Mohamed Moumine,Afrane Yaw,Hakizimana Emmanuel,Muleba Mbanga,Orefuwa Emma,Chaki Prosper,Juma Elijah Omondi
Abstract
AbstractAfrica and the United States are both large, heterogeneous geographies with a diverse range of ecologies, climates and mosquito species diversity which contribute to disease transmission and nuisance biting. In the United States, mosquito control is nationally, and regionally coordinated and in so much as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) provides guidance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides pesticide registration, and the states provide legal authority and oversight, the implementation is usually decentralized to the state, county, or city level. Mosquito control operations are organized, in most instances, into fully independent mosquito abatement districts, public works departments, local health departments. In some cases, municipalities engage independent private contractors to undertake mosquito control within their jurisdictions. In sub–Saharan Africa (SSA), where most vector-borne disease endemic countries lie, mosquito control is organized centrally at the national level. In this model, the disease control programmes (national malaria control programmes or national malaria elimination programmes (NMCP/NMEP)) are embedded within the central governments’ ministries of health (MoHs) and drive vector control policy development and implementation. Because of the high disease burden and limited resources, the primary endpoint of mosquito control in these settings is reduction of mosquito borne diseases, primarily, malaria. In the United States, however, the endpoint is mosquito control, therefore, significant (or even greater) emphasis is laid on nuisance mosquitoes as much as disease vectors. The authors detail experiences and learnings gathered by the delegation of African vector control professionals that participated in a formal exchange programme initiated by the Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA), the University of Notre Dame, and members of the American Mosquito Control Association (AMCA), in the United States between the year 2021 and 2022. The authors highlight the key components of mosquito control operations in the United States and compare them to mosquito control programmes in SSA countries endemic for vector-borne diseases, deriving important lessons that could be useful for vector control in SSA.
Funder
US Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference75 articles.
1. Debboun M, Nava MR, Rueda L. Mosquitoes communities, and public health in. Texas: Academic Press; 2019.
2. Maxwell CA, Msuya E, Sudi M, Njunwa KJ, Carneiro IA, Curtis CF. Effect of community-wide use of insecticide-treated nets for 3–4 years on malarial morbidity in Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2002;7:1003–8.
3. Hawley WA, Phillips-Howard PA, ter Kuile FO, Terlouw DJ, Vulule JM, Ombok M, et al. Community-wide effects of permethrin-treated bed nets on child mortality and malaria morbidity in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:121–7.
4. Roll Back Malaria. The global malaria action plan for a malaria-free world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
5. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207–11.