European first-year university students accept evolution but lack substantial knowledge about it: a standardized European cross-country assessment
-
Published:2021-11-30
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:1936-6426
-
Container-title:Evolution: Education and Outreach
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Evo Edu Outreach
Author:
Kuschmierz PaulORCID, Beniermann Anna, Bergmann Alexander, Pinxten Rianne, Aivelo Tuomas, Berniak-Woźny Justyna, Bohlin Gustav, Bugallo-Rodriguez Anxela, Cardia Pedro, Cavadas Bento Filipe Barreiras Pinto, Cebesoy Umran Betul, Cvetković Dragana D., Demarsy Emilie, Đorđević Mirko S., Drobniak Szymon M., Dubchak Liudmyla, Dvořáková Radka M., Fančovičová Jana, Fortin Corinne, Futo Momir, Geamănă Nicoleta Adriana, Gericke Niklas, Grasso Donato A., Lendvai Ádám Z., Mavrikaki Evangelia, Meneganzin Andra, Mogias Athanasios, Möller Andrea, Mota Paulo G., Naciri Yamama, Németh Zoltán, Ożańska-Ponikwia Katarzyna, Paolucci Silvia, Pap Péter László, Petersson Maria, Pietrzak Barbara, Pievani Telmo, Pobric Alma, Porozovs Juris, Realdon Giulia, Sá-Pinto Xana, Savković Uroš B., Sicard Mathieu, Sofonea Mircea T., Sorgo Andrej, Stermin Alexandru N., Tăușan Ioan, Torkar Gregor, Türkmen Lütfullah, Tutnjević Slavica, Uitto Anna E., Varga Máté, Varga Mirna, Vazquez-Ben Lucia, Venetis Constantinos, Viguera Enrique, Virtbauer Lisa Christine, Vutsova Albena, Yruela Inmaculada, Zandveld Jelle, Graf Dittmar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Investigations of evolution knowledge and acceptance and their relation are central to evolution education research. Ambiguous results in this field of study demonstrate a variety of measuring issues, for instance differently theorized constructs, or a lack of standardized methods, especially for cross-country comparisons. In particular, meaningful comparisons across European countries, with their varying cultural backgrounds and education systems, are rare, often include only few countries, and lack standardization. To address these deficits, we conducted a standardized European survey, on 9200 first-year university students in 26 European countries utilizing a validated, comprehensive questionnaire, the “Evolution Education Questionnaire”, to assess evolution acceptance and knowledge, as well as influencing factors on evolution acceptance.
Results
We found that, despite European countries’ different cultural backgrounds and education systems, European first-year university students generally accept evolution. At the same time, they lack substantial knowledge about it, even if they are enrolled in a biology-related study program. Additionally, we developed a multilevel-model that determines religious faith as the main influencing factor in accepting evolution. According to our model, knowledge about evolution and interest in biological topics also increase acceptance of evolution, but to a much lesser extent than religious faith. The effect of age and sex, as well as the country’s affiliation, students’ denomination, and whether or not a student is enrolled in a biology-related university program, is negligible.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that, despite all their differences, most of the European education systems for upper secondary education lead to acceptance of evolution at least in university students. It appears that, at least in this sample, the differences in knowledge between countries reflect neither the extent to which school curricula cover evolutionary biology nor the percentage of biology-related students in the country samples. Future studies should investigate the role of different European school curricula, identify particularly problematic or underrepresented evolutionary concepts in biology education, and analyze the role of religious faith when teaching evolution.
Funder
European Cooperation in Science and Technology Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference122 articles.
1. Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage; 1991. 2. Akyol G, Tekkaya C, Sungur S. The contribution of understandings of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service science teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory. Proc Soc Behav. 2010;9:1889–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.419. 3. Akyol G, Tekkaya C, Sungur S, Traynor A. Modeling the interrelationships among pre-service science teachers’ understanding and acceptance of evolution, their views on nature of science and self-efficacy beliefs regarding teaching evolution. J Sci Teach Educ. 2012;23(8):937–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9296-x. 4. Allmon WD. Why don’t people think evolution is true? Implications for teaching, in and out of the classroom. Evol Educ Outreach. 2011;4(4):648–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0371-0. 5. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|