Platform governance and sociological participation

Author:

Lu Peng,Zhou Lvjun,Fan XiaoguangORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe positive and negative effects of the participation of digital platform companies in governance are a major issue of the times. Starting from the three subfields of internal governance, external governance, and co-governance, we construct an analytical framework for digital platform governance to understand the four-sided relationship among digital platform companies, the state, the market, and society. From the perspective of enterprise autonomy, we should view the effectiveness of platform company participation in social governance dialectically. The key of promoting good platform governance is to improve the external structural pressure from the state, promote the reform of the endogenous governance of enterprises, and build a sustainable architecture for co-governance. The mission of sociologists includes not only explanation but also intervention.

Funder

Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behavior

Artificial Intelligence for Gender Equality

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference79 articles.

1. Abbott, K.W., and D. Snidal. 2009. The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State. The Politics of Global Regulation 44: 52–91.

2. Academy of Information and Communications Technology. 2019. Report on internet Platform Governance (Hu Lian Wang Ping Tai Zhi Li Yan Jiu Bao Gao). Retrieved March 15, 2019. (http://www.199it.com/archives/843867.html).

3. Academy of Information and Communications Technology. 2020. Report on Data and Intelligent Application in Epidemic Prevention and Control (version 1.0) (Yi Qing Fang Kong Zhong De Shu Ju Yu Zhi Neng Ying Yong Yan Jiu Bao Gao). Retrieved March 9, 2020. (http://www.199it.com/archives/1016260.html).

4. Andersson Schwarz, J. 2017. Platform Logic: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Platform-Based Economy. Policy & Internet 9(4): 374–394.

5. Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2018. Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(1): 16–32.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3