Digital measurement of hands-on performance? Ecological validation of a computer-based assessment of automotive repair skills

Author:

Hartmann StefanORCID,Güzel Emre,Gschwendtner Tobias

Abstract

AbstractWe investigated the ecological validity of performance measures from a computer-based assessment tool that utilises scripted video vignettes. The intended purpose of this tool is to assess the maintenance and repair skills of automotive technician apprentices, complementing traditional hands-on assessment formats from the German journeymen’s exams. We hypothesise that the ability to correctly judge repair actions shown in videos is a good predictor of the ability to perform corresponding actions in hands-on scenarios. Apprentices in the third year of vocational training carried out repairs on real cars or car systems, while experts rated their performance. After this, they worked on our computer-based tests, which utilise videos of very similar repairs. The correlation between video judgement and hands-on performance was lower than expected for most repair actions as well as for overall scores, indicating insufficient ecological validity of the test score interpretations. However, the findings are promising for developing future tests, as the results for some repair actions indicate it is generally possible to develop ecologically valid video-based items focusing on hands-on skills. We discuss the results in the light of a validation framework that combines validity evidence from different sources for the same assessment tool. Finally, we hope our findings contribute to a broader discussion about the psychometric quality of exams.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference45 articles.

1. American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education [AERA, APA, & NCME] (2014) Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

2. Bejar II, Williamson DM, Mislevy RJ (2006) Human scoring. In: Williamson DM, Bejar II, Mislevy RJ (eds) Automated scoring of complex tasks in computer-based testing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 49–81

3. Bennett RE (2002) Inexorable and inevitable: the continuing story of technology and assessment. J Technol Learn Assess 1(1). http://www.jtla.org

4. Bennett RE, Braswell J, Oranje A, Sandene B, Kaplan B, Yan F (2008) Does it matter if i take my mathematics test on computer? A second empirical study of mode effects in NAEP. J Technol Learn Assess 6(9). http://www.jtla.org

5. Clariana R, Wallace P (2002) Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect. Br J Edu Technol 33(5):593–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00294

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3