Abstract
AbstractThe current study investigated university students’ well-being during Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) via EMPATHICS framework in the aftermath of an earthquake that struck the Eastern part of Türkiye. The study had a mixed-methods research design, where quantitative data were analyzed through descriptives of the participants’ overall happiness indices, and qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis of those of narrations. Gathered through convenience sampling, the participants were constituted by 18 university students recruited from the department of Foreign Language Education at a state university in Türkiye. The results scrutinized that the participants did not exhibit elevated levels of well-being within the context of ERT. Additionally, the dimensions of the EMPHATICS framework were elaborated in detail to reveal their psychological well-being during ERT, which could also provide pedagogical implications for student well-being and suggestions for further research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Ackerman, R. H., & Maslin-Ostrowski, P. (2002). The wounded leader: How real leadership emerges in times of crisis. Jossey-Bass Inc.
2. Ağçam, R., Akbana, Y. E., & Rathert, S. (2021). Dealing with emergency remote teaching: The case of pre-service English language teachers in Turkey. Journal of Language and Education, 7(4), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11995
3. Amorati, R., & Hajek, J. (2023). Fostering well-being in the university L2 classroom: The “I am an author” project. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0051
4. Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. In J. P. Forgas & J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 189–203). Elsevier.
5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056