Author:
Mücke Natalie Alida,Schmidt Alexandra,Kersting Christine,Kalitzkus Vera,Pentzek Michael,Wilm Stefan,Mortsiefer Achim
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundIn Germany, there are neither guidelines provided by the medical associations nor a public discussion about general practitioners (GPs) treating their family members. Only few studies on this topic from the primary care setting exist. The aim of this study is to describe GPs’ treatment of family members and to generate empirical data on the most common reasons for this.MethodsIn June 2018 we conducted a postal survey among GPs in the North Rhine region of Germany. The questionnaire was developed in a stepwise process including initial expert panels, interviews with GPs, item construction workshops, cognitive pre-tests and pilot testing with 40 questionnaires. The final questionnaire addressed: type and frequency of treatment, documentation and place of treatment, engagement as the official GP as well as reasons for and against the treatment. For data evaluation, descriptive and explorative statistical analyses were conducted.ResultsOverall, 393 questionnaires were returned (response rate 39.8%). 96.7% of the GPs had treated at least one family member during the last 12 months. Services that were provided frequently (more than three times in the last 12 months) included the prescription or dispensing of medication (partner 45%, children 37%, parents 43%, partner’s parents 26%), physical examinations (partner 18%, children 24%, parents 25%, partner’s parents 15%), and the arrangement or provision of laboratory tests (partner 14%, children 7%, parents 16%, partner’s parents 9%). Less than one third of the study participants always treated their relatives in their office. Male GPs more often provided care to family members (except children) registered in their practice. Senior male GPs treated their relatives more often than junior female GPs. Family members were most commonly treated for practical reasons.ConclusionThe subject of GPs treating their relatives is of high everyday relevance, since nearly all GPs are involved in the treatment of their family members. Frequent at-home treatments and low documentation rates may indicate risks due to deviating from the professional routine.
Funder
Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Mortsiefer A. "Diese Tabletten schreibt mir immer meine Mutter auf".: Wie können Ärzte verantwortlich mit Krankheitsfällen in ihrer eigenen Familie umgehen? In: Kalitzkus V, editor. Familienmedizin in der hausärztlichen Versorgung der Zukunft. Düsseldorf: Dup Düsseldorf Univ. Press; 2013.
2. Bundesärztekammer. (Muster-)Berufsordnung für die in Deutschland tätigen Ärztinnen und Ärzte. 2018. https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/pdf-Ordner/MBO/MBO-AE.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2022.
3. American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics: AMA; 2016.
4. Medical Board of Australia. Codes, Guidelines and Policies; 2014.
5. Câmara Dos Deputados. Deputados; 1932.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献