Japanese primary care physicians’ experience in treating their family members: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Matsunaga Taku,Kaneko Makoto,Fetters Michael D.,Inoue Machiko

Abstract

Abstract Background Guidelines worldwide recommend that physicians should not treat their family members. However, studies in the U.S. have shown that approximately 74–83% of physicians have experience of treating family members. Primary care physicians were more likely to have such experiences than other specialists. In Japan, physicians do not have any guidelines regarding treating family members, and little is known about the experiences of primary care physicians. Therefore, we investigated the experience of treating family members or relatives among primary care physicians in Japan. Methods This cross-sectional study used an online questionnaire. We recruited 2,000 physicians who were members of the Japan Primary Care Association using random sampling. Data were collected from February 10 to March 10, 2021. We compare the experiences of treating family members between clinic-based doctors and hospital-based doctors using the chi-square test. We performed logistic regression analysis to adjust for gender, age, presence of a doctor in family, and physician’s geographic location (rural or not rural). Results A total of 466 physicians (response rate = 23.3%) completed the survey. Of the sample, 79.8% had experience of treating family members or relatives. In the univariate analysis, being a clinic-based physician was associated with experience in treating family members compared to hospital-based physicians (87.6% vs. 74.9%, p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that being a clinic-based physician (odds ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.31–4.04) and age of 45–64 years (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.74–4.93) were significantly related to experience treating family. Gender and geographic location were not statistically significant factors. Conclusions A high percentage of Japanese primary care physicians, especially those who worked in clinics, reported experience treating family members or relatives. These findings will serve as basic data for future studies regarding the care of families and relatives of physicians in Japan.

Funder

The Future Research Leader Training Program of the Japan Primary Care Association

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Family Practice

Reference21 articles.

1. Gold KJ, Goldman EB, Kamil LH, Walton S, Burdette TG, Moseley KL. No appointment necessary? ethical challenges in treating friends and family. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(Suppl 13):1254–8.

2. Joel MG, Catherine AM, Kenneth VI. Emergency physician care of family members, friends, colleagues and self. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(5):942–6.

3. American Medical Association. Treating self or family. AMA code of medical ethics opinions on patient-physician relationships, 2016. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-01/code-of-medical-ethics-chapter-1_0.pdf. Accessed 1 January 2022.

4. Sulmasy LS, Bledsoe TA, ACP Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. American college of physicians ethics manual: seventh edition. Ann Intern Med. 2019;15 Suppl 170:S1-S32.

5. Canadian Medical Association. CMA code of ethics and professionalism. approved by the CMA board of directors. 2018. https://policybase.cma.ca/documents/policypdf/PD19-03.pdf. Accessed 1 January 2022.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3