Identifying populations with chronic pain in primary care: developing an algorithm and logic rules applied to coded primary care diagnostic and medication data

Author:

Hafezparast Nasrin,Bragan Turner Ellie,Dunbar-Rees Rupert,Vusirikala Amoolya,Vodden Alice,de La Morinière Victoria,Yeo Katy,Dodhia Hiten,Durbaba Stevo,Shetty Siddesh,Ashworth Mark

Abstract

Abstract Background Estimates of chronic pain prevalence using coded primary care data are likely to be substantially lower than estimates derived from community surveys. Most primary care studies have estimated chronic pain prevalence using data searches confined to analgesic medication prescriptions. Increasingly, following recent NICE guideline recommendations, patients and doctors opt for non-drug treatment of chronic pain thus excluding these patients from prevalence estimates based on medication codes. We aimed to develop and test an algorithm combining medication codes with selected diagnostic codes to estimate chronic pain prevalence using coded primary care data. Methods Following a scoping review 4 criteria were developed to identify cohorts of people with chronic pain. These were (1) people with one of 12 (‘tier 1’) conditions that almost always results in the individual having chronic pain (2) people with one of 20 (‘tier 2’) conditions included when there are also 3 or more prescription-only analgesics issued in the last 12 months (3) chronic neuropathic pain, or (4) 4 or more prescription-only analgesics issued in the last 12 months. These were translated into 8 logic rules which included 1,932 SNOMED CT codes. Results The algorithm was run on primary care data from 41 GP Practices in Lambeth. The total population consisted of 386,238 GP registered adults ≥ 18 years as of the 31st March 2021. 64,135 (16.6%) were identified as people with chronic pain. This definition demonstrated notably high rates in Black ethnicity females, and higher rates in the most deprived, and older population. Conclusions Estimates of chronic pain prevalence using structured healthcare data have previously shown lower prevalence estimates for chronic pain than reported in community surveys. This has limited the ability of researchers and clinicians to fully understand and address the complex multifactorial nature of chronic pain. Our study demonstrates that it may be possible to establish more representative prevalence estimates using structured data than previously possible. Use of logic rules offers the potential to move systematic identification and population-based management of chronic pain into mainstream clinical practice at scale and support improved management of symptom burden for people experiencing chronic pain.

Funder

Guy's and St Thomas' Charity

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Family Practice

Reference27 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2021) NG193: Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng193. Accessed 08 Dec 2022.

2. Chronic Pain in Adults. 2017. Health Survey for England. London: Public Health England; 2017. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/940858/Chronic_Pain_Report.pdf. Accessed 08 Dec 2022.

3. Bondesson E, Larrosa Pardo F, Stigmar K, Ringqvist Ã, Petersson IF, Jöud A, et al. Comorbidity between pain and mental illness – evidence of a bidirectional relationship. Eur J Pain. 2018;22:1304–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1218. Accessed 08 Dec 2022.

4. Fayaz A, Croft P, Langford RM, Donaldson LJ, Jones GT. Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies. BMJ Open. 2016;20:e010364. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010364. Accessed 08 Dec 2022.

5. Cassell A, Edwards D, Harshfield A, Rhodes K, Brimicombe K, Payne R, et al. The epidemiology of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68:e245-251. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18x695465. Accessed 08 Dec 2022.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3