Predictors of persistent opioid use in Australian primary care: a retrospective cohort study, 2018–2022

Author:

Jung Monica12ORCID,Xia Ting1,Ilomäki Jenni23,Pearce Christopher45,Aitken Angela6,Nielsen Suzanne1

Affiliation:

1. Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria 3199, Australia

2. Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia

3. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia

4. Aurora Primary Care Research Institute , Melbourne, Victoria 3130, Australia

5. Department of General Practice, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia

6. Gippsland Primary Health Network , Traralgon, Victoria 3844, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Objective To examine the predictors of persistent opioid use (“persistence”) in people initiating opioids for non-cancer pain in Australian primary care. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Australian primary care. Subjects People prescribed opioid analgesics between 2018 and 2022, identified through the Population Level Analysis and Reporting (POLAR) database. Methods Persistence was defined as receiving opioid prescriptions for at least 90 days with a gap of less than 60 days between subsequent prescriptions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the predictors of persistent opioid use. Results The sample consisted of 343 023 people initiating opioids for non-cancer pain; of these, 16 527 (4.8%) developed persistent opioid use. Predictors of persistence included older age (≥75 vs 15–44 years: adjusted odds ratio: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.58–1.78); concessional beneficiary status (1.78, 1.71–1.86); diagnosis of substance use disorder (1.44, 1.22–1.71) or chronic pain (2.05, 1.85–2.27); initiation of opioid therapy with buprenorphine (1.95, 1.73–2.20) or long-acting opioids (2.07, 1.90–2.25); provision of higher quantity of opioids prescribed at initiation (total oral morphine equivalents of ≥750 mg vs <100 mg: 7.75, 6.89–8.72); provision of repeat/refill opioid prescriptions at initiation (2.94, 2.77–3.12); and prescription of gabapentinoids (1.59, 1.50–1.68), benzodiazepines (1.43, 1.38–1.50), and z-drugs (eg, zopiclone, zolpidem; 1.61, 1.46–1.78). Conclusions These findings add to the limited evidence of individual-level factors associated with persistent opioid use. Further research is needed to understand the clinical outcomes of persistent opioid use in people with these risk factors to support the safe and effective prescribing of opioids.

Funder

Australian National Health

Medical Research Council

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3