Author:
Grosse-Kleimann Julia,Wegner Birte,Spiekermeier Ines,grosse Beilage Elisabeth,Kemper Nicole,Nienhoff Hendrik,Plate Heiko,Meyer Henning,Gerhardy Hubert,Kreienbrock Lothar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of processed secondary data for health monitoring of fattening pigs has been established in various areas, such as the use of antibiotics or in the context of meat inspection. Standardized scores were calculated based on several sources of production data and can be used to describe animal health in a large collective of pig units. In the present study, the extent to which these scores are related to different farm characteristics and management decisions were investigated. In addition, slaughter scores were compared with the results of a veterinary examination on the farms.
Results
The comparison of the results of the uni- and multifactorial analyses revealed that almost all of the examined factors play a role in at least one of the scores when considered individually. However, when various significant influencing factors were taken into account at any one time, most of the variables lost their statistical significance due to confounding effects. In particular, production data such as production costs or daily feed intake remained in the final models of the scores on mortality, average daily gain and external lesions. Regarding the second part of the investigation, a basic technical correlation between the slaughter scores and the on-farm indicators could be established via principal component analysis. The modelling of the slaughter scores by the on-farm indicators showed that the score on external lesions could be represented by equivalent variables recorded on the farm (e.g., lesions caused by tail or ear biting).
Conclusions
It has been demonstrated that the examined health scores are influenced by various farm and management characteristics. However, when several factors are taken into account, confounding occurs in some cases, which must be considered by consultants. Additionally, it was shown that on-farm examination content is related to the scores based on equivalent findings from slaughter pigs.
Funder
Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung
Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover (TIHO)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Small Animals
Reference37 articles.
1. Scientific Opinion on. the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare in pigs. 2012.
2. Grosse-Kleimann J, Plate H, Meyer H, Gerhardy H, Heucke CE, Kreienbrock L. Health Monitoring of Finishing Pigs by Secondary Data Use – A Longitudinal Analysis. Porcine Health Management. 2021;7(20).
3. Kish L. A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. Journal of the American statistical Association. 1949;44(247):380–7.
4. Dohoo I, Martin SW, Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. 2nd Edition ed. Ver Inc. Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. 2009; p. 865.
5. Meese GB, Ewbank R. The establishment and nature of the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig. Anim Behav. 1973;21(2):326–34.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献