Abstract
Abstract
Background
Digitalization in healthcare and society can be challenging, particularly for people who have limited digital experiences. New digital technologies can influence individuals’ perceived safety and well-being. In this study, we aimed to identify and analyze the literature on needs and influencing factors in the context of emotional and psychological safety and digitalization in healthcare.
Methods
A scoping review was conducted based on the PRISMA-ScR standard. The literature was searched based on the databases Medline via PubMed, PsycINFO via Ovid, and CINAHL via EBSCO. Literature was included after a review of the titles, abstracts, and full texts published in English or German in the last 5 years (October 2017–September 2022). Eligible literature included definitions and descriptions of emotional and/or psychological safety and was related to digitalization in healthcare and was analyzed qualitatively via inductive content analysis. The findings were analyzed from ethical, psychosocial, legal, economic, and political perspectives.
Results
A total of 32 publications were finally included thereof qualitative (n = 20), quantitative (n = 3), and mixed methods (n = 2) studies. Other included publications were systematic integrative reviews, scoping reviews, narrative reviews, white papers, and ethical statements. Of these publications, four qualitative studies focused on emotional or psychological safety in the context of digital technology use in healthcare as a primary research aim. Most literature has shown that perceived safety is influenced by perceived changes in healthcare, digital (health) literacy, the design of digital technology, and need orientation. The needs identified in this context overlap strongly with the influencing factors. A low or high perceived safety has an impact on users’ thoughts and actions.
Conclusion
The importance of emotional safety in the context of digital technologies in healthcare is growing, while psychological safety seems to be underrepresented. The interaction between the influencing factors and the need to feel safe leads to considerations that can affect user behavior and have far-reaching outcomes for the implementation of digital technology in healthcare.
Systematic review registration
Open Science Framework Registries on 16 December 2022 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HVYPT.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Iyamu I, Xu AXT, Gómez-Ramírez O, Ablona A, Chang HJ, Mckee G, et al. Defining digital public health and the role of digitization, digitalization, and digital transformation: scoping review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(11):e30399.
2. Nakrem S, Solbjør M, Pettersen IN, Kleiven HH. Care relationships at stake? Home healthcare professionals’ experiences with digital medicine dispensers - A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–10.
3. Nyholm L, Santamäki-Fischer R, Fagerström L. Users’ ambivalent sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare. Inform Health Soc Care. 2021;46(2):218–26.
4. Okhrimenko I, Sovik I, Pyankova S, Lukyanova A. Digital transformation of the socioeconomic system: Prospects for digitalization in society. Espacios. 2019;40(38):26–34.
5. Lyndon A, Davis D-A, Sharma AE, Scott KA. Emotional safety is patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023;0:1–4.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献