Author:
Liu Hsing-Yuan,Han Hui-Mei,Chen Hsiu-Fang,Han Chin-Yen,Huang Ding-Hau,Hsu Ding-Yang,Chiang Chen-Hung
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Prior studies have indicated team members’ interaction behaviors may predict creativity among nursing students.
Methods
This study investigated the correlation between interaction behaviors and creativity, both individual- and team-level, among nursing students. In this cross-sectional quantitative study, data were obtained from self-reported questionnaires. Individual creativity was assessed using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking scale; the perceived team interaction behavior and team creativity were assessed using validated instruments. Canonical correlation analysis was conducted to determine the overall correlation between interaction behaviors, and creativity, and the moderating effect of female proportion dominance was also examined.
Results
A total of 164 nursing students (84.1% female) arranged into 14 teams were included in this study. Canonical correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between interaction behaviors and creativity (correlation = 0.88). All dimensions of interactive behaviors were positively related to creativity dimensions. A stronger correlation to team creativity (correlation = 1) was found compared to individual creativity (correlation = 0.07). This study demonstrated that individual interactive behaviors including spontaneous communication and helping behavior predicted high team creativity.
Conclusions
This insight may be valuable for nursing education programs seeking to foster creativity and effective teamwork. The potential moderating effect of female proportions on team interaction behaviors and creativity should be investigated further.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
2. Hartman RL, Crume AL. Educating nursing students in team conflict communication. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2014;4:107–18.
3. Woermann U, Weltsch L, Kunz A, Stricker D, Guttormsen S. Attitude towards and readiness for interprofessional education in medical and nursing students of Bern. GMS J Med Educ. 2016;33:Doc73.
4. Hannon J, Hocking C, Legge K, Lugg A. Sustaining interdisciplinary education: developing boundary crossing governance. High Educ Res Dev. 2018;37:1424–38.
5. Kim HN. A conceptual framework for interdisciplinary education in engineering and nursing health informatics. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;74:91–9.