Abstract
AbstractThe newly developed vortex-identification method, Liutex, has provided a new systematic description of the local fluid rotation, which includes scalar, vector, and tensor forms. However, the advantages of Liutex over the other widely used vortex-identification methods such as Q, ∆, λ2, and λci have not been realized. These traditional methods count on shearing and stretching as a part of vortex strength. But, in the real flow, shearing and stretching do not contribute to fluid rotation. In this paper, the decomposition of the velocity gradient tensor is conducted in the Principal Coordinate for uniqueness. Then the contamination effects of stretching and shearing of the traditional methods are investigated and compared with the Liutex method in terms of mathematical analysis and numerical calculations. The results show that the Liutex method is the only method that is not affected by either stretching or shear, as it represents only the local fluid rigid rotation. These results provide supporting evidence that Liutex is the superior method over others.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Liu C, Yan Y, Lu P (2014) Physics of turbulence generation and sustenance in a boundary layer. Comput Fluids 102:353–384
2. Helmholtz H (1858) On the integrals of the hydrodynamic equations corresponding to vortex motions. J für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 55:22–25 (in German)
3. Saffman P (1992) Vortices dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Zhou Y, Antonia RA (1993) A study of turbulent vortices in the near wake of a cylinder. J Fluid Mech 253:643–661
5. Epps B (2017) Review of vortex identification methods. AIAA 2017:0989
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献