Large-scale genomic analysis reveals the genetic cost of chicken domestication
-
Published:2021-06-16
Issue:1
Volume:19
Page:
-
ISSN:1741-7007
-
Container-title:BMC Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Biol
Author:
Wang Ming-ShanORCID, Zhang Jin-Jin, Guo Xing, Li Ming, Meyer Rachel, Ashari Hidayat, Zheng Zhu-Qing, Wang Sheng, Peng Min-Sheng, Jiang Yu, Thakur Mukesh, Suwannapoom Chatmongkon, Esmailizadeh Ali, Hirimuthugoda Nalini Yasoda, Zein Moch Syamsul Arifin, Kusza Szilvia, Kharrati-Koopaee Hamed, Zeng Lin, Wang Yun-Mei, Yin Ting-Ting, Yang Min-Min, Li Ming-Li, Lu Xue-Mei, Lasagna Emiliano, Ceccobelli Simone, Gunwardana Humpita Gamaralalage Thilini Nisank, Senasig Thilina Madusanka, Feng Shao-Hong, Zhang Hao, Bhuiyan Abul Kashem Fazlul Haque, Khan Muhammad Sajjad, Silva Gamamada Liyanage Lalanie Pradeepa, Thuy Le Thi, Mwai Okeyo A., Ibrahim Mohamed Nawaz Mohamed, Zhang Guojie, Qu Kai-Xing, Hanotte Olivier, Shapiro Beth, Bosse Mirte, Wu Dong-Dong, Han Jian-Lin, Zhang Ya-Ping
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Species domestication is generally characterized by the exploitation of high-impact mutations through processes that involve complex shifting demographics of domesticated species. These include not only inbreeding and artificial selection that may lead to the emergence of evolutionary bottlenecks, but also post-divergence gene flow and introgression. Although domestication potentially affects the occurrence of both desired and undesired mutations, the way wild relatives of domesticated species evolve and how expensive the genetic cost underlying domestication is remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the demographic history and genetic load of chicken domestication.
Results
We analyzed a dataset comprising over 800 whole genomes from both indigenous chickens and wild jungle fowls. We show that despite having a higher genetic diversity than their wild counterparts (average π, 0.00326 vs. 0.00316), the red jungle fowls, the present-day domestic chickens experienced a dramatic population size decline during their early domestication. Our analyses suggest that the concomitant bottleneck induced 2.95% more deleterious mutations across chicken genomes compared with red jungle fowls, supporting the “cost of domestication” hypothesis. Particularly, we find that 62.4% of deleterious SNPs in domestic chickens are maintained in heterozygous states and masked as recessive alleles, challenging the power of modern breeding programs to effectively eliminate these genetic loads. Finally, we suggest that positive selection decreases the incidence but increases the frequency of deleterious SNPs in domestic chicken genomes.
Conclusion
This study reveals a new landscape of demographic history and genomic changes associated with chicken domestication and provides insight into the evolutionary genomic profiles of domesticated animals managed under modern human selection.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Developmental Biology,Plant Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Structural Biology,Biotechnology
Reference87 articles.
1. Bosse M, Megens HJ, Derks MFL, de Cara AMR, Groenen MAM. Deleterious alleles in the context of domestication, inbreeding, and selection. Evol Appl. 2019;12(1):6–17 https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12691. 2. Makino T, Rubin CJ, Carneiro M, Axelsson E, Andersson L, Webster MT. Elevated proportions of deleterious genetic variation in domestic animals and plants. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10(1):276–90 https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy004. 3. Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC. Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data. Genetics. 2011;187(2):553–66 https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.124560. 4. Groß C, Bortoluzzi C, de Ridder D, Megens H-J, Groenen MAM, Reinders M, et al. Evolutionarily conserved non-protein-coding regions in the chicken genome harbor functionally important variation. bioRxiv. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.012005. 5. Carneiro M, Rubin CJ, Di Palma F, Albert FW, Alfoldi J, Martinez Barrio A, et al. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication. Science (New York, NY). 2014;345(6200):1074–9 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253714.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|