Identification and characterisation of spontaneous mutations causing deafness from a targeted knockout programme
-
Published:2022-03-17
Issue:1
Volume:20
Page:
-
ISSN:1741-7007
-
Container-title:BMC Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Biol
Author:
Lewis Morag A.,Ingham Neil J.,Chen Jing,Pearson Selina,Di Domenico Francesca,Rekhi Sohinder,Allen Rochelle,Drake Matthew,Willaert Annelore,Rook Victoria,Pass Johanna,Keane Thomas,Adams David J.,Tucker Abigail S.,White Jacqueline K.,Steel Karen P.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Mice carrying targeted mutations are important for investigating gene function and the role of genes in disease, but off-target mutagenic effects associated with the processes of generating targeted alleles, for instance using Crispr, and culturing embryonic stem cells, offer opportunities for spontaneous mutations to arise. Identifying spontaneous mutations relies on the detection of phenotypes segregating independently of targeted alleles, and having a broad estimate of the level of mutations generated by intensive breeding programmes is difficult given that many phenotypes are easy to miss if not specifically looked for. Here we present data from a large, targeted knockout programme in which mice were analysed through a phenotyping pipeline. Such spontaneous mutations segregating within mutant lines may confound phenotypic analyses, highlighting the importance of record-keeping and maintaining correct pedigrees.
Results
Twenty-five lines out of 1311 displayed different deafness phenotypes that did not segregate with the targeted allele. We observed a variety of phenotypes by Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and behavioural assessment and isolated eight lines showing early-onset severe progressive hearing loss, later-onset progressive hearing loss, low frequency hearing loss, or complete deafness, with vestibular dysfunction. The causative mutations identified include deletions, insertions, and point mutations, some of which involve new genes not previously associated with deafness while others are new alleles of genes known to underlie hearing loss. Two of the latter show a phenotype much reduced in severity compared to other mutant alleles of the same gene. We investigated the ES cells from which these lines were derived and determined that only one of the 8 mutations could have arisen in the ES cell, and in that case, only after targeting. Instead, most of the non-segregating mutations appear to have occurred during breeding of mutant mice. In one case, the mutation arose within the wildtype colony used for expanding mutant lines.
Conclusions
Our data show that spontaneous mutations with observable effects on phenotype are a common side effect of intensive breeding programmes, including those underlying targeted mutation programmes. Such spontaneous mutations segregating within mutant lines may confound phenotypic analyses, highlighting the importance of record-keeping and maintaining correct pedigrees.
Funder
wellcome trust medical research council european commission biotechnology and biological sciences research council research foundation flanders
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Developmental Biology,Plant Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Structural Biology,Biotechnology
Reference104 articles.
1. Ayabe S, Nakashima K, Yoshiki A. Off- and on-target effects of genome editing in mouse embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2019;65(1):1–5. 2. Iyer V, Boroviak K, Thomas M, Doe B, Riva L, Ryder E, Adams DJ. No unexpected CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity revealed by trio sequencing of gene-edited mice. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(7):e1007503. 3. Willi M, Smith HE, Wang C, Liu C, Hennighausen L. Mutation frequency is not increased in CRISPR-Cas9-edited mice. Nat Methods. 2018;15(10):756–8. 4. Anderson KR, Haeussler M, Watanabe C, Janakiraman V, Lund J, Modrusan Z, Stinson J, Bei Q, Buechler A, Yu C, et al. CRISPR off-target analysis in genetically engineered rats and mice. Nat Methods. 2018;15(7):512–4. 5. Cervantes RB, Stringer JR, Shao C, Tischfield JA, Stambrook PJ. Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(6):3586–90.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|