Abstract
Abstract
Background
Reducing health inequities for children from a disadvantaged background is an important task in public health. While intersectoral partnerships are a promising way to achieve this, few studies have examined the factors influencing the success of these interventions. In this study, we conducted a process evaluation of the integrated community-based intervention Präventionskette Freiham that the city of Munich, Germany, has implemented in a new residential development area. The aim was to investigate the implementation process as well as barriers and facilitators.
Methods
Following a mixed methods approach, we collected data from different core groups making up Präventionskette Freiham from April 2020 to August 2022, exploring their perspective on the implementation process. We conducted repeated qualitative interviews with the network coordinators and eleven local professionals from institutions engaged with or relevant for the intervention. We also undertook a focus group with four members of the advisory group representing the three municipal departments guiding the intervention. Ego-centered network maps were drawn by the network coordinators to chart the development of the network. Subsequently, we also conducted an online survey with local network members.
Results
At the early stage of the implementation process, the intervention was able to integrate actors from different sectors, serving as a platform for mutual exchange. However, the network produced limited output. According to the interviews, this may be mainly attributable to the early development status of the area. We identified seven topics that may act as facilitators or barriers to implementation of Präventionskette Freiham: (1) availability of resources, (2) political and administrative support, (3) the network coordinators, (4) network-internal processes, (5) trans-institutional cooperation, (6) perceived benefits of engagement, and (7) the output of the network.
Conclusions
The early development status of the area was a challenge for the intervention. This emphasizes the need to carefully consider context when planning and implementing integrated community-based public health interventions in new residential development areas.
Funder
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Lampert T, Hoebel J, Kuntz B, Finger JD, Holling H, Lange M, et al. Health inequalities among children and adolescents in Germany. Developments over time and trends from the KiGGS study. J Health Monit. 2019;4(1):15–37.
2. Pillas D, Marmot M, Naicker K, Goldblatt P, Morrison J, Pikhart H. Social inequalities in early childhood health and development: a european-wide systematic review. Pediatr Res. 2014;76(5):418–24.
3. Inchley JCD, Young T, Samdal O, Torsheim T, Auguston L, Mathisen F, Aleman-Diaz A, Molcho M, Weber M, Barnekow V. Growing up unequal: gender and socioeconomic differences in young people‘s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016.
4. Eozenou PH, Neelsen S, Lindelow M. Child Health Outcome inequalities in Low and Middle Income Countries. Health Syst Reform. 2021;7(2):e1934955.
5. Carrilero N, Dalmau-Bueno A, Garcia-Altes A. Socioeconomic inequalities in 29 childhood diseases: evidence from a 1,500,000 children population retrospective study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献