Association between fluid intake and extubation failure in intensive care unit patients with negative fluid balance: a retrospective observational study

Author:

Li Tong,Zhou Dawei,Zhao Dong,Lin Qing,Wang Dija,Wang Chao

Abstract

Abstract Background Negative fluid balance (NFB) is associated with reduced extubation failure. However, whether achieving more NFB can further improve extubation outcome has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate whether more NFB and restricted fluid intake were associated with extubation success. Methods We performed a retrospective study of adult patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) admitted to Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) from 2001 to 2012. Patients with duration of MV over 24 hours and NFB within 24 hours before extubation were included for analysis. The primary outcome was extubation failure, defined as reintubation within 72 hours after extubation. Association between fluid balance or fluid intake and extubation outcome were investigated with multivariable logistic models. Results A total of 3433 extubation events were recorded. 1803 with NFB were included for the final analysis, of which 201(11.1%) were extubation failure. Compared with slight NFB (− 20 to 0 ml/kg), more NFB were not associated improved extubation outcome. Compared with moderate fluid intake (30 to 60 ml/kg), lower (< 30 ml/kg, OR 0.75, 95% CI [0.54, 1.05], p = 0.088) or higher (> 60 ml/kg, OR 1.63, 95% CI [0.73, 3.35], p = 0.206) fluid intake was not associated with extubation outcome. Duration of MV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypercapnia, use of diuretics, and SAPSIIscore were associated with extubation failure. Conclusions More NFB or restricted fluid intake were not associated with reduced extubation failure in patients with NFB. However, for COPD patients, restricted fluid intake was associated with extubation success.

Funder

Youth Top-notch Talent Program of Beijing Tongren Hospital

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3