Basal cell carcinoma risk and solar UV exposure in occupationally relevant anatomic sites: do histological subtype, tumor localization and Fitzpatrick phototype play a role? A population-based case-control study
-
Published:2020-09-10
Issue:1
Volume:15
Page:
-
ISSN:1745-6673
-
Container-title:Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Occup Med Toxicol
Author:
Bauer A.ORCID, Haufe E., Heinrich L., Seidler A., Schulze H. J., Elsner P., Drexler H., Letzel S., John S. M., Fartasch M., Brüning T., Dugas-Breit S., Gina M., Weistenhöfer W., Bachmann K., Bruhn I., Lang B. M., Brans R., Allam J. P., Grobe W., Westerhausen S., Knuschke P., Wittlich M., Diepgen T. L., Schmitt J., Bieber Thomas, Bonness Sonja, Brecht Beate, Grabbe Stephan, Küster Denise, Ruppert Linda, Stephan Victoria, Thielitz Anja, Zimmermann Elisabeth,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A two-fold risk increase to develop basal cell carcinoma was seen in outdoor workers exposed to high solar UV radiation compared to controls. However, there is an ongoing discussion whether histopathological subtype, tumor localization and Fitzpatrick phototype may influence the risk estimates.
Objectives
To evaluate the influence of histological subtype, tumor localization and Fitzpatrick phototype on the risk to develop basal cell carcinoma in highly UV-exposed cases and controls compared to those with moderate or low solar UV exposure.
Methods
Six hundred forty-three participants suffering from incident basal cell carcinoma in commonly sun-exposed anatomic sites (capillitium, face, lip, neck, dorsum of the hands, forearms outside, décolleté) of a population-based, case-control, multicenter study performed from 2013 to 2015 in Germany were matched to controls without skin cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted stratified for histological subtype, phototype 1/2 and 3/4. Dose-response curves adjusted for age, age2, sex, phototype and non-occupational UV exposure were calculated.
Results
Participants with high versus no (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.24–3.50; p = 0.006) or versus moderate (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.15–3.65; p = 0.015) occupational UV exposure showed a more than two-fold significantly increased risk to develop BCC in commonly UV-exposed body sites. Multivariate regression analysis did not show an influence of phototype or histological subtype on risk estimates. The restriction of the analysis to BCC cases in commonly sun-exposed body sites did not influence the risk estimates. The occupational UV dosage leading to a 2-fold increased basal cell carcinoma risk was 6126 standard erythema doses.
Conclusion
The risk to develop basal cell carcinoma in highly occupationally UV-exposed skin was doubled consistently, independent of histological subtype, tumor localization and Fitzpatrick phototype.
Funder
Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung Stiftung Hochschulmedizin Dresden Technische Universität Dresden
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Safety Research,Toxicology
Reference38 articles.
1. Paterson SK, Godsmark CN. Heat-health vulnerability in temperate climates: lessons and response options from Ireland. Global Health. 2020;16:29. 2. Intranuovo G, Schiavulli N, Cavone D, Birtolo F, Cocco P, Vimercati L, Macinagrossa L, Giordano A, Perrone T, Ingravallo G, Mazza P, Strusi M, Spinosa C, Specchia G, Ferri GM. Assessment of DNA damages in lymphocytes of agricultural workers exposed to pesticides by comet assay in a cross-sectional study. Biomarkers. 2018;23:462–73. 3. Al-Bouwarthan M, Quinn MM, Kriebel D, Wegman DH. A field evaluation of construction workers’ activity, hydration status, and heat strain in the extreme summer heat of Saudi Arabia. Ann Work Expo Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa029 [Epub ahead of print]. 4. Vimercati L, Gatti MF, Baldassarre A, Nettis E, Favia N, Palma M, Martina GL, Di Leo E, Musti M. Occupational Exposure to Urban Air Pollution and Allergic Diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:12977–87. 5. Saladi RN, Persaud AN. The causes of skin cancer: a comprehensive review. Drugs Today. 2005;41:37–53.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|