Author:
Brenner Everton A,Zein Imad,Chen Yongsheng,Andersen Jeppe R,Wenzel Gerhard,Ouzunova Milena,Eder Joachim,Darnhofer Birte,Frei Uschi,Barrière Yves,Lübberstedt Thomas
Abstract
Abstract
Background
OMT (O-methyltransferase) genes are involved in lignin biosynthesis, which relates to stover cell wall digestibility. Reduced lignin content is an important determinant of both forage quality and ethanol conversion efficiency of maize stover.
Results
Variation in genomic sequences coding for COMT, CCoAOMT1, and CCoAOMT2 was analyzed in relation to stover cell wall digestibility for a panel of 40 European forage maize inbred lines, and re-analyzed for a panel of 34 lines from a published French study. Different methodologies for association analysis were performed and compared. Across association methodologies, a total number of 25, 12, 1, 6 COMT polymorphic sites were significantly associated with DNDF, OMD, NDF, and WSC, respectively. Association analysis for CCoAOMT1 and CCoAOMT2 identified substantially fewer polymorphic sites (3 and 2, respectively) associated with the investigated traits. Our re-analysis on the 34 lines from a published French dataset identified 14 polymorphic sites significantly associated with cell wall digestibility, two of them were consistent with our study. Promising polymorphisms putatively causally associated with variability of cell wall digestibility were inferred from the total number of significantly associated SNPs/Indels.
Conclusions
Several polymorphic sites for three O-methyltransferase loci were associated with stover cell wall digestibility. All three tested genes seem to be involved in controlling DNDF, in particular COMT. Thus, considerable variation among Bm3 wildtype alleles can be exploited for improving cell-wall digestibility. Target sites for functional markers were identified enabling development of efficient marker-based selection strategies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Gray KA, Zhao L, Emptage M: Bioethanol. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2006, 10: 141-146. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.02.035.
2. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G, Zacchi G: Bio-ethanol - the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24: 549-556. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.004.
3. Lin Y, Tanaka S: Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006, 69: 627-642. 10.1007/s00253-005-0229-x.
4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda (U.S. DOE Office of Science and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 2006). [http://www.doegenomestolife.org/biofuels/]
5. Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M: Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003, 54: 519-546. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938.