Author:
Metatla Ines,Roger Kevin,Chhuon Cerina,Ceccacci Sara,Chapelle Manuel,Pierre-Olivier Schmit ,Demichev Vadim,Guerrera Ida Chiara
Abstract
AbstractPlasma proteomics holds immense potential for clinical research and biomarker discovery, serving as a non-invasive "liquid biopsy" for tissue sampling. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics, thanks to improvement in speed and robustness, emerges as an ideal technology for exploring the plasma proteome for its unbiased and highly specific protein identification and quantification. Despite its potential, plasma proteomics is still a challenge due to the vast dynamic range of protein abundance, hindering the detection of less abundant proteins. Different approaches can help overcome this challenge. Conventional depletion methods face limitations in cost, throughput, accuracy, and off-target depletion. Nanoparticle-based enrichment shows promise in compressing dynamic range, but cost remains a constraint. Enrichment strategies for extracellular vesicles (EVs) can enhance plasma proteome coverage dramatically, but current methods are still too laborious for large series. Neat plasma remains popular for its cost-effectiveness, time efficiency, and low volume requirement. We used a test set of 33 plasma samples for all evaluations. Samples were digested using S-Trap and analyzed on Evosep One and nanoElute coupled to a timsTOF Pro using different elution gradients and ion mobility ranges. Data were mainly analyzed using library-free searches using DIA-NN. This study explores ways to improve proteome coverage in neat plasma both in MS data acquisition and MS data analysis. We demonstrate the value of sampling smaller hydrophilic peptides, increasing chromatographic separation, and using library-free searches. Additionally, we introduce the EV boost approach, that leverages on the extracellular vesicle fraction to enhance protein identification in neat plasma samples. Globally, our optimized analysis workflow allows the quantification of over 1000 proteins in neat plasma with a 24SPD throughput. We believe that these considerations can be of help independently of the LC–MS platform used.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Ignjatovic V, Geyer PE, Palaniappan KK, Chaaban JE, Omenn GS, Baker MS, et al. Mass spectrometry-based plasma proteomics: considerations from sample collection to achieving translational data. J Proteome Res. 2019;18:4085–97.
2. Anderson NL. The clinical plasma proteome: a survey of clinical assays for proteins in plasma and serum. Clin Chem. 2010;56:177–85.
3. Bader JM, Albrecht V, Mann M. MS-Based Proteomics of Body Fluids: The End of the Beginning. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 24];22. Available from: https://www.mcponline.org/article/S1535-9476(23)00088-9/abstract
4. Lan J, Núñez Galindo A, Doecke J, Fowler C, Martins RN, Rainey-Smith SR, et al. Systematic evaluation of the use of human plasma and serum for mass-spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2018;17:1426–35.
5. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects *. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:845–67.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献