Proteomics Studies on Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Glioblastoma: Where Do We Stand?
-
Published:2024-09-10
Issue:18
Volume:25
Page:9778
-
ISSN:1422-0067
-
Container-title:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJMS
Author:
Giuliani Patricia12, De Simone Chiara12, Febo Giorgia12, Bellasame Alessia12, Tupone Nicola23, Di Virglio Vimal23, di Giuseppe Fabrizio23, Ciccarelli Renata2ORCID, Di Iorio Patrizia12, Angelucci Stefania34
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy 2. Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via L Polacchi 13, 66100 Chieti, Italy 3. Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy 4. Stem TeCh Group, Via L Polacchi 13, 66100 Chieti, Italy
Abstract
Like most tumors, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the deadliest brain tumor in human adulthood, releases extracellular vesicles (EVs). Their content, reflecting that of the tumor of origin, can be donated to nearby and distant cells which, by acquiring it, become more aggressive. Therefore, the study of EV-transported molecules has become very important. Particular attention has been paid to EV proteins to uncover new GBM biomarkers and potential druggable targets. Proteomic studies have mainly been performed by “bottom-up” mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of EVs isolated by different procedures from conditioned media of cultured GBM cells and biological fluids from GBM patients. Although a great number of dysregulated proteins have been identified, the translation of these findings into clinics remains elusive, probably due to multiple factors, including the lack of standardized procedures for isolation/characterization of EVs and analysis of their proteome. Thus, it is time to change research strategies by adopting, in addition to harmonized EV selection techniques, different MS methods aimed at identifying selected tumoral protein mutations and/or isoforms due to post-translational modifications, which more deeply influence the tumor behavior. Hopefully, these data integrated with those from other “omics” disciplines will lead to the discovery of druggable pathways for novel GBM therapies.
Reference128 articles.
1. Eckerdt, F., and Platanias, L.C. (2023). Emerging Role of Glioma Stem Cells in Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance. Cancers, 15. 2. An update on the molecular biology of glioblastoma, with clinical implications and progress in its treatment;Verdugo;Cancer Commun.,2022 3. Virtuoso, A., D’Amico, G., Scalia, F., De Luca, C., Papa, M., Maugeri, G., D’Agata, V., Caruso Bavisotto, C., and D’Amico, A.G. (2024). The Interplay between Glioblastoma Cells and Tumor Microenvironment: New Perspectives for Early Diagnosis and Targeted Cancer Therapy. Brain Sci., 14. 4. Matarredona, E.R., and Pastor, A.M. (2019). Extracellular vesicle-mediated communication between the glioblastoma and its microenvironment. Cells, 9. 5. Wang, M., Graner, A.N., Knowles, B., McRae, C., Fringuello, A., Paucek, P., Gavrilovic, M., Redwine, M., Hanson, C., and Coughlan, C. (2024). A tale of two tumors: Differential, but detrimental, effects of glioblastoma extracellular vesicles (EVs) on normal human brain cells. bioRxiv.
|
|