Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in online exhibits of science museums: Covid-19 on the scene

Author:

Sotério CarolinaORCID,dos Santos Lamim Adriele RibeiroORCID,Queiroz Salete LinharesORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe Covid-19 pandemic has sparked an unprecedented public debate over socio-scientific controversies, particularly regarding vaccination and social distancing measures. Despite the potential of such subjects for developing critical thinking and a sense of citizenship, the theme of controversies is still incipient in science museums. This documentary study investigates the way three science institutions have proposed online exhibits on Covid-19 on Google Arts & Culture platform and checks their potential for favoring teaching on controversial science topics. Google Arts & Culture platform was searched for Covid-19-related keywords and the filtering of the results was based on focus and organizing institutions. Three exhibits were detected, whose analysis was submitted to an inter-rater agreement (Cohen’s kappa). The results revealed the predominance of social and economic aspects that can strongly favor more scientifically progressive views of both science literacy and a socially undistorted science. On the other hand, the superficiality of political discussions on science topics, a lack of naturalization of the controversial discussions, and an excessive use of textual content were identified, thus revealing some initiatives have not explored the interactivity, multimediality, and the way dilemmas that mark the trajectory of science museums extend to online exhibits. From this perspective, we point out paths for teaching and learning socio-scientific controversies in museums.

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference77 articles.

1. Abutaleb, B. Y., & Harris, S. (2021). Trump administration’s hunt for pandemic ‘lab leak’ went down many paths and came up with no smoking gun. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/us-intelligence-wuhan-lab-coronavirus-origin/2021/06/15/2fc2425e-ca24-11eb-afd0-9726f7ec0ba6_story.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2022.

2. Allen, L. B., & Crowley, K. J. (2014). Challenging beliefs, practices, and content: How museum educators change. Science Education, 98(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21093.

3. Arnold, K. (1996). Presenting science as productor as a process: Museums and the making of science. In S. Pearce (Ed.), Exploring science in museums. London: The Athlone Press.

4. Bardoel, J., & Deuze, M. (2001). “Network journalism”: Converging competences of old and new media professionals. Australian Journalism Review, 23(2), 91–103.

5. Blaney, J. R., & Hunt, S. K. (2021). COVID-19 internet responses from the state broadcast associations: Community, industry, and extent of spread. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2020.1870466.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3