Abstract
AbstractWater is critical to sustain human existence. Water literacy involves understanding the interactions within and between natural and human dimensions of water systems to support informed decision-making, an important outcome for learners of all ages. It is therefore critical to foster water literacy in today’s global citizens, particularly through formal education. The purpose of this study, in tandem with a parallel study focusing on natural dimensions of water systems (Mostacedo-Marasovic et al., in press), is to examine water-related K-12 standards for teaching and learning about human dimensions of water systems to develop a comprehensive and transdisciplinary perspective on water education. Our overarching question is, “What do disciplinary standards specify as outcomes for students’ learning about water and humans?”. Our research questions are: i) “To what extent do these water-related standards address recognized domains of learning?” and ii) “What thematic outcomes for students’ learning are apparent across grades in these water-related standards?”. We use chi-square statistics and a conventional qualitative content analysis method complemented by processes from grounded theory to analyze water-related education standards (N = 341) from 12 education-oriented, governmental and non-governmental organizations based in the United States. Our results indicate that first, water-related standards emphasize the cognitive domain, including declarative and procedural knowledge. The affective domain and its social and emotional components are much less prevalent. Second, the water-related standards illustrate five categories which encompass human dimensions of water spanning K-12 grade bands, including human settlements; the nexus between water, food, and energy; public health; impacts of human activities on water quality and quantity; and water resources management. Overall, the study contributes to a more holistic and comprehensive perspective of water and human systems that can help inform teaching and learning to cultivate water literacy, including curriculum development and classroom pedagogy.
Funder
National Science Foundation
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture HEC
PD-STEP
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Amahmid, O., El Guarmri, Y., Yazidi, M., Razoki, B., Kaid Rassou, K., Rakibi, Y., … El Ouardi, T. (2019). Water education in school curricula: Impact on children’s knowledge, attitudes and behaviors towards water use. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(3), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2018.1513446.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy, (1st ed., ). Oxford University Press.
3. American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture (2012). Pillars of agricultural literacy: Understanding the intersection between agriculture and society. American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture.
4. Ballantyne, R. R., & Packer, J. M. (1996). Teaching and learning in environmental education: Developing environmental conceptions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1996.9941455.
5. Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9033-3.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献