Abstract
Abstract
Background
For years, multiple trait genetic evaluations have been used to increase the accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBV) using information from correlated traits. In France, accurate approximations of multiple trait evaluations were implemented for traits that are described by different models by combining the results of univariate best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) evaluations. Functional longevity (FL) is the trait that has most benefited from this approach. Currently, with many single-step (SS) evaluations, only univariate FL evaluations can be run. The aim of this study was to implement a “combined” SS (CSS) evaluation that extends the “combined” BLUP evaluation to obtain more accurate genomic (G) EBV for FL when information from five correlated traits (somatic cell score, clinical mastitis, conception rate for heifers and cows, and udder depth) is added.
Results
GEBV obtained from univariate SS (USS) evaluations and from a CSS evaluation were compared. The correlations between these GEBV showed the benefits of including information from correlated traits. Indeed, a CSS evaluation run without any performances on FL showed that the indirect information from correlated traits to evaluate FL was substantial. USS and CSS evaluations that mimic SS evaluations with data available in 2016 were compared. For each evaluation separately, the GEBV were sorted and then split into 10 consecutive groups (deciles). Survival curves were calculated for each group, based on the observed productive life of these cows as known in 2021. Regardless of their genotyping status, the worst group of heifers based on their GEBV in 2016 was well identified in the CSS evaluation and they had a substantially shorter herd life, while those in the best heifer group had a longer herd life. The gaps between groups were more important for the genotyped than the ungenotyped heifers, which indicates better prediction of future survival.
Conclusions
A CSS evaluation is an efficient tool to improve FL. It allows a proper combination of information on functional traits that influence culling. In contrast, because of the strong selection intensity on young bulls for functional traits, the benefit of such a “combined” evaluation of functional traits is more modest for these males.
Funder
CASDAR : Compte d'attribution spéciale du développement agricole et rural
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology,General Medicine,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference53 articles.
1. Meuwissen THE, De Jong G, Engel B. Joint estimation of breeding values and heterogeneous variances of large data files. J Dairy Sci. 1996;79:310–6.
2. Robert-Granié C, Bonaı̈ti B, Boichard D, Barbat A. Accounting for variance heterogeneity in French dairy cattle genetic evaluation. Livest Prod Sci. 1999;60:343–57.
3. Robert-Granié C, Ducrocq V, Foulley J. Heterogeneity of variance for type traits in the Montbeliarde cattle breed. Genet Sel Evol. 1997;29:545–70.
4. Ducrocq V, Boichard D, Barbat A, Larroque H. Implementation of an approximate multitrait BLUP evaluation to combine production traits and functional traits into a total merit index In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production: 26–29 August 2001, Budapest. 2001.
5. Lassen J, Sørensen MK, Madsen P, Ducrocq V. A stochastic simulation study on validation of an approximate multitrait model using preadjusted data for prediction of breeding values. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3002–11.