Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study examined the generational-gender distinctions in Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) subtypes among East Asian patients.
Methods
Consecutive “first-visit” TMD patients presenting at two university-based TMD/orofacial pain clinics in China and South Korea were enlisted. Demographic information along with symptom history was gathered and clinical examinations were performed according to the DC/TMD methodology. Axis I physical diagnoses were rendered with the DC/TMD algorithms and categorized into painful and non-painful TMDs. Patients were categorized into three birth cohorts, specifically Gen X, Y, and Z (born 1965–1980, 1981–1999, and 2000–2012 respectively) and the two genders. Data were evaluated using Chi-square/Kruskal-Wallis plus post-hoc tests and logistic regression analyses (α = 0.05).
Results
Gen X, Y, and Z formed 17.2%, 62.1%, and 20.7% of the 1717 eligible patients examined (mean age 29.7 ± 10.6 years; 75.7% women). Significant differences in prevalences of arthralgia, myalgia, headache (Gen X ≥ Y > Z), and disc displacements (Gen Z > Y > X) were observed among the three generations. Gen Z had substantially fewer pain-related and more intra-articular conditions than the other generations. Women presented a significantly greater frequency of degenerative joint disease and number of intra-articular conditions than men. After controlling for generation-gender interactions, multivariate analyses showed that “being Gen X” and female increased the risk of painful TMDs (OR = 2.20) and reduced the odds of non-painful TMDs (OR = 0.46).
Conclusions
Generational-gender diversities in DC/TMD subtypes exist and are important for guiding TMD care and future research endeavors.
Funder
Capital’s Fund for Health Improvement and Research from the Beijing Municipal Health Commission
National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project in China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. List T, Jensen RH. Temporomandibular disorders: old ideas and new concepts. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(7):692–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102416686302.
2. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6–27. https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1151.
3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and, Health M, and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs). : From research discoveries to clinical treatment, Yost O, Liverman CT, English R, Mackey S, Bond EC, editors. Temporomandibular Disorders: Priorities for researchcare. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2020.
4. Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Sanders AE, et al. Summary of findings from the OPPERA prospective cohort study of incidence of first-onset temporomandibular disorder: implications and future directions. J Pain. 2013;14(12 Suppl):T116–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.010.
5. Slade GD, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, et al. Painful temporomandibular disorder: Decade of discovery from OPPERA studies. J Dent Res. 2016;95(10):1084–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516653743.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献