Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study investigated oral behaviors in various temporomandibular disorder (TMD) subtypes, assessing their frequency, extent, and associations with both jaw functional status and psychological distress.
Materials and methods
Anonymized data from consecutive "initial-visit" TMD patients at a university-affiliated oral medicine clinic were obtained. Alongside demographic information, patients completed various questionnaires including the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) Symptom Questionnaire, Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC), Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7). Patients underwent a protocolized clinical examination and received diagnoses of pain-related (PT), intra-articular (IT), or combined (CT) TMD using the DC/TMD diagnostic algorithms. Data were evaluated with Chi-square/non-parametric tests and logistic regression analyses (α = 0.05).
Results
The study comprised 700 patients (mean age 37.4 ± 15.7 years), with 12.6%, 15.1%, and 72.3% diagnosed with PT, IT, and CT, respectively. For all TMD subtypes, oral activities during sleep were more prevalent than those during wakefulness. While variations in total/subscale OBC scores were insignificant, substantial differences were observed in global/subscale JFLS (PT, CT > IT), depression (PT, CT > IT), and anxiety (CT > IT) scores. Near-moderate correlations (rs = 0,36–0.39) were discerned between overall/waking-state non-functional oral behaviors and depression/anxiety. Multivariate analysis indicated that the odds of different TMD subtypes were influenced by sex, age, and jaw functional status.
Conclusions
For all TMD patients, sleep-related oral activities were more commonly reported than waking-state activities. Factors such as sex, age, and jaw functional limitation are associated with the likelihood of different TMD subtypes.
Statement of clinical relevance
Oral behaviors, in themselves, do not predict distinct TMD subtypes, in contrast to factors such as sex, age, and jaw functional status.
Funder
Seoul National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Care Services, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Committee on Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) (2020) From research discoveries to clinical treatment. In: Yost O, Liverman CT, English R, Mackey S, Bond EC (eds) Temporomandibular disorders: priorities for research and care, Chap 1 and 2. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC), pp 17–80. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25652/temporomandibular-isorderspriorities-for-research-and-care
2. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E et al (2014) Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 28:6–27. https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1151
3. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F (2011) Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 112:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.021
4. Busse JW, Casassus R, Carrasco-Labra A et al (2023) Management of chronic pain associated with temporomandibular disorders: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ 383:e076227. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076227
5. Ferrillo M, Giudice A, Marotta N et al (2022) Pain management and rehabilitation for central sensitization in Temporomandibular disorders: A comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci 23:12164. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012164