Abstract
Abstract
Background
Late preterm infants (LPIs) are at risk of neurodevelopmental delay. Research on their cognitive development is helpful for early intervention and follow-up.
Methods
Event-related potential (ERP) and resting electroencephalography (RS-EEG) were used to study the brain cognitive function of LPIs in the early stage of life. The Gesell Developmental Scale (GDS) was used to track the neurodevelopmental status at the age of 1 year after correction, and to explore the neurophysiological indicators that could predict the outcome of cognitive development in the early stage.
Results
The results showed that mismatch response (MMR) amplitude, RS-EEG power spectrum and functional connectivity all suggested that LPIs were lagging behind. At the age of 1 year after correction, high-risk LPIs showed no significant delay in gross motor function, but lagged behind in fine motor function, language, personal social interaction and adaptability. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive role of MMR amplitude in the brain cognitive development prognosis at 1 year, showing a sensitivity of 80.00% and a specificity of 90.57%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.788, with a P-value of 0.007.
Conclusions
Based on our findings we supposed that the cognitive function of LPI lags behind that of full-term infants in early life. Preterm birth and perinatal diseases or high risk factors affected brain cognitive function in LPIs. MMR amplitude can be used as an early predictor of brain cognitive development in LPIs.
Trial registration
This clinical trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR). Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100041929. Date of registration: 2021-01-10. URL of the trial registry record: https://www.chictr.org.cn/.
Funder
Jiangsu Provincial Health Committee General project
Changzhou Science and Technology Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Zhanghua Y, Jihong Q, Bei W, Tianwen Z, Dongying Z, Yonghong Z, et al. Prospective study of short-tem Complications and intellectual development in late pretem infants. Chin J Neonatology. 2015;30(2):112–6.
2. Ballantyne M, Benzies KM, McDonald S, Magill-Evans J, Tough S. Risk of developmental delay: comparison of late preterm and full term Canadian infants at age 12 months. Early Hum Dev. 2016;101:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.04.004.
3. Cheong JL, Doyle LW, Burnett AC, Lee KJ, Walsh JM, Potter CR, et al. Association between Moderate and late Preterm Birth and Neurodevelopment and Social-Emotional Development at Age 2 years. Jama Pediatr. 2017;171(4). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4805.
4. Woythaler M, McCormick MC, Mao WY, Smith VC. Late Preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcomes at Kindergarten. Pediatrics. 2015;136(3):424–31. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-4043.
5. Allan NP, Hume LE, Allan DM, Farrington AL, Lonigan CJ. Relations between inhibitory control and the development of academic skills in preschool and kindergarten: a meta-analysis. Dev Psychol. 2014;50(10):2368–79.