Abstract
Abstract
Key message
In arboriculture, the number and diversity of pollen donors can have a major impact on fruit production. We studied pollination insurance in hybrid chestnut orchards (C. sativa × C. crenata) provided by nearby wild European chestnuts (C. sativa) in southwestern France. Most fruits were sired by hybrid pollenizers rather than by wild chestnuts. When these hybrid pollenizers were too scarce, a frequent situation, pollen produced by wild chestnut trees did not compensate for the lack of compatible pollen and fertilization rates and fruit production collapsed.
Context
The demand for chestnuts has been increasing in recent years in many European countries, but fruit production is not sufficient to meet this demand. Improving pollination service in chestnut orchards could increase fruit production.
Aims
Investigate pollination service in chestnut orchards. Evaluate the contribution to pollination of trees growing in chestnut woods and forests.
Methods
We investigated five orchards planted with hybrid chestnuts (C. sativa × C. crenata) cultivars in southwestern France. We combined fruit set data, which provide information about pollination rate, with genetic data, which provide information about pollen origin. We used this information to estimate the contribution of nearby C. sativa forest stands to the pollination of each orchard.
Results
Pollination rates vary considerably, being fivefold higher in orchards comprising numerous pollen donors than in monovarietal orchards. Because of asymmetric hybridization barriers between hybrid and purebred cultivars, the surrounding chestnut forests provide very limited pollination insurance: less than 14% of the flowers in these monovarietal orchards had been pollinated by forest trees.
Conclusion
Because chestnut orchards are now increasingly relying on hybrid cultivars, surrounding wild European chestnut trees are no longer a reliable pollen source. To achieve maximal fruit set, efforts must therefore concentrate on orchard design, which should include enough cultivar diversity.
Funder
ANRt
Conseil Régional Aquitaine
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Arnold JB (2016) ggthemes: extra themes, scales and geoms for “ggplot2”
2. Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, Arroyo J (1996) Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Floral Biology. Springer US, Boston, pp 339–376
3. Biton I, Many Y, Mazen A, Ben-Ari G (2020) Compatibility between “Arbequina” and “Souri” olive cultivars may increase souri fruit set. Agronomy 10:910. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060910
4. Breisch H (1995) Châtaignes et Marrons. Centre technique interprofessionnel des fruits et légumes, Paris
5. Carisio L, Díaz SS, Ponso S et al (2020) Effects of pollinizer density and apple tree position on pollination efficiency in cv. Gala. Sci Horticult 273:109629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109629
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献