Author:
Michaeli Nichole,De Luca Giovanna,Gitau Mary,Myers Justin,Ojuka Daniel,Ouma Derick,Wieland Travis,Wanjiku Grace
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Basic Emergency Care: Approach to the acutely ill and injured course was developed to train health care providers to recognize, stabilize, and treat critically ill patients in resource-limited settings. This study evaluates the Basic Emergency Care course as a tool for improving the emergency medicine knowledge and skills of medical students in a lower-middle income country.
Methods
This prospective study was conducted with senior medical students at the University of Nairobi School of Medicine in October 2021. Participants’ knowledge was assessed with multiple choice pre- and post-course examinations. Pre- and post-course surveys assessed participants’ confidence in managing acutely ill and injured patients using a 4-point Likert scale.
Results
A total of 30 students from the graduating medical school class participated in the study. Post-course examination scores (mean 94.5%, range 80–100%) showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) compared to pre-course examination scores (mean 82%, range 64–96%). Participants’ comfort and confidence in providing emergency care and performing critical emergency skills significantly increased (p < 0.05) between the pre- and post-course surveys.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that the Basic Emergency Care course is effective in providing senior medical students with basic emergency medicine knowledge and increasing their confidence to identify and address life-threatening conditions prior to their intern year.
Funder
Framework in Global Health Grant
Department of Emergency Medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
Office of Global Health Education’s Global Health Scholars Program at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Chang CY, Abujaber S, Reynolds TA, Camargo CA, Obermeyer Z. Burden of emergency conditions and emergency care usage: new estimates from 40 countries. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(11):794–800. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-205709.
2. Razzak J, Usmani MF, Bhutta ZA. Global, regional and national burden of emergency medical diseases using specific emergency disease indicators: analysis of the 2015 global burden of disease study. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(2):e000733. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000733.
3. World Health Organization. Emergency care systems for universal health coverage: ensuring timely care for the acutely ill and injured. Geneva: WHO. 2019 May. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/A72_77-en.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2022.
4. Kobusingye OC, Hyder AA, Bishai D, Hicks ER, Mock C, Joshipura M. Emergency medical systems in low-and middle-income countries: recommendations for action. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83:626–31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2626309/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
5. Levine AC, Presser DZ, Rosborough S, Ghebreyesus TA, Davis MA. Understanding barriers to emergency care in low-income countries: view from the front line. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(5):467–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00005240.