Author:
Walker Susan H.,Hooks Claire,Blake Diane
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Provision of contraception to women in the immediate postnatal period has been endorsed by professional bodies, to reduce the incidence of short inter-pregnancy intervals. This study examined the views of postnatal women and practising midwives regarding provision of contraceptive advice and contraceptive methods by midwives, in a region of the United Kingdom.
Methods
A mixed-method approach using qualitative interviews with midwives, and a postnatal survey followed by qualitative interviews with postnatal women, in five hospitals in the East of England. Twenty-one practising midwives and ten women were interviewed. Two hundred and twenty-seven women returned a survey.
Survey data was analysed descriptively, augmented by Student’s t-tests and Chi-squared tests to examine associations within the data.
Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed guided by the phases of thematic analysis.
Results
Midwives and women supported the concept of increased midwifery provision of contraceptive advice, and provision of contraceptive methods in the postnatal period. Convenience and an established trusting relationship were reasons for preferring midwifery provision over visiting a doctor for contraception.
The best time for detailed discussion was reported to be antenatal and community visits. The Progesterone-only-pill (POP) was the method, in which women indicated most interest postnatally.
Concerns for midwives included the need for increased education on contraceptive methods and training in supplying these. Structural barriers to such provision were time pressures, low prioritisation of contraceptive training and disputes over funding.
Conclusions
Women reported interest in midwives supplying contraceptive methods and expressed the view that this would be convenient and highly acceptable. Midwives are supportive of the concept of providing enhanced contraceptive advice and methods to women in their care, and believe that it would be advantageous for women.
Institutional support is required to overcome structural barriers such as poor access to continuous professional development, and to allow contraceptive provision to be fully recognised as integral to the midwifery role, rather than a marginalised addition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference42 articles.
1. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. FSRH Guideline Contraception After Pregnancy. 2017;(January):1–18.
2. McKinney D, House M, Chen A, Muglia L, DeFranco E. The influence of interpregnancy interval on infant mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):316.e1–316.e9. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.018.
3. Schummers L, Hutcheon JA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Williams PL, Hacker MR, Vanderweele TJ, et al. Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval with Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1661–70.
4. WHO. Report of a WHO Technical Consultation on Birth Spacing. Rep WHO Tech Consult Birth Spacing. 2005;13(6):1–44. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/birth_spacing.pdf
5. Royal College of Obtetricians and Gynecologists. RCOG Best Practice in Post partum Family Planing 2015.pdf. 2015.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献