Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Contraceptive counseling during the perinatal period is an important component of comprehensive perinatal care. We synthesized research about contraceptive counseling during the perinatal period, which has not previously been systematically compiled.
Methods
We developed search criteria to identify articles listed in PubMed, Embase, and Popline databases published between 1992 and July 2022 that address patients’ preferences for, and experiences of, perinatal contraceptive counseling, as well as health outcomes associated with this counseling. Search results were independently reviewed by multiple reviewers to assess relevance for the present review. Methods were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
Results
Thirty-four articles were included in the final full text review. Of the included articles, 10 included implementation and evaluation of a contraceptive counseling method or protocol, and 24 evaluated preferences for or experiences of existing contraceptive counseling in the perinatal period. Common themes included the acceptability of contraceptive counseling in the peripartum and postpartum periods, and a preference for contraceptive counseling at some point during the antenatal period and before the inpatient hospital experience, and direct provider-patient discussion instead of video or written material. Multiple studies suggest that timing, content, and modality should be individualized. In general, avoiding actual or perceived directiveness and providing multi-modal counseling that includes both written educational materials and patient-provider conversations was desired.
Discussion
The perinatal period constitutes a critical opportunity to provide contraceptive counseling that can support pregnant and postpartum people’s management of their reproductive futures. The reviewed studies highlight the importance of patient-centered approach to providing this care, including flexibility of timing, content, and modality to accommodate individual preferences.
Funder
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Akinade, T., Kheyfets, A., Piverger, N., Layne, T. M., Howell, E. A., & Janevic, T. (2023). The influence of racial-ethnic discrimination on women’s health care outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 316, 114983.
2. Altman, M. R., McLemore, M. R., Oseguera, T., Lyndon, A., & Franck, L. S. (2020). Listening to women: Recommendations from women of color to improve experiences in pregnancy and birth care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 65(4), 466–473.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2022). Patient-centered contraceptive counseling. committee statement No 1. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 139, 349–353.
4. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
5. Barnet, B., Liu, J., DeVoe, M., Duggan, A. K., Gold, M. A., & Pecukonis, E. (2009). Motivational intervention to reduce rapid subsequent births to adolescent mothers: A community-based randomized trial. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(5), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1014