Author:
Ranjbar Amene,Montazeri Farideh,Farashah Mohammadsadegh Vahidi,Mehrnoush Vahid,Darsareh Fatemeh,Roozbeh Nasibeh
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Low birth weight (LBW) has been linked to infant mortality. Predicting LBW is a valuable preventative tool and predictor of newborn health risks. The current study employed a machine learning model to predict LBW.
Methods
This study implemented predictive LBW models based on the data obtained from the “Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)” from January 2020 to January 2022. Women with singleton pregnancies above the gestational age of 24 weeks were included. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies. A predictive model was built using eight statistical learning models (logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Expert opinion and prior observational cohorts were used to select candidate LBW predictors for all models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were measured to evaluate their diagnostic performance.
Results
We found 1280 women with a recorded LBW out of 8853 deliveries, for a frequency of 14.5%. Deep learning (AUROC: 0.86), random forest classification (AUROC: 0.79), and extreme gradient boost classification (AUROC: 0.79) all have higher AUROC and perform better than others. When the other performance parameters of the models mentioned above with higher AUROC were compared, the extreme gradient boost model was the best model to predict LBW with an accuracy of 0.79, precision of 0.87, recall of 0.69, and F1 score of 0.77. According to the feature importance rank, gestational age and prior history of LBW were the top critical predictors.
Conclusions
Although this study found that the extreme gradient boost model performed well in predicting LBW, more research is needed to make a better conclusion on the performance of ML models in predicting LBW.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference23 articles.
1. Chen Y, Li G, Ruan Y, Zou L, Wang X, Zhang W. An epidemiological survey on low birth weight infants in China and analysis of outcomes of full-term low birth weight infants. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:242. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-242. PMID:24370213;PMCID:PMC3877972.
2. Heaman MI, Martens PJ, Brownell MD, Chartier MJ, Derksen SA, Helewa ME. The Association of inadequate and intensive prenatal care with maternal, fetal, and infant outcomes: a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(7):947–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.09.006. Epub 2019 Jan 11 PMID: 30639165.
3. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Williams obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010. p. 804- 831. 23.
4. Senthilkumar D, Paulraj S. Prediction of low birth weight infants and its risk factors using data mining techniques. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management; IMEOM '15. Dubai: IEOM Society; 2015.
5. Ahmadi P, Alavimajd H, Khodakarim S, Tapak L, Kariman N, Amini P, Pazhuheian F. Prediction of low birth weight using random forest: a comparison with logistic regression. Arch Adv Biosci. 2017;8(3):36–43. https://doi.org/10.22037/jps.v8i3.15412.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献