Abstract
Abstract
Background
Demand for both the ambulance service and the emergency department (ED) is rising every year and when this demand is excessive in both systems, ambulance crews queue at the ED waiting to hand patients over. Some transported ambulance patients are ‘low-acuity’ and do not require the treatment of the ED. However, paramedics can find it challenging to identify these patients accurately. Decision support tools have been developed using expert opinion to help identify these low acuity patients but have failed to show a benefit beyond regular decision-making. Predictive algorithms may be able to build accurate models, which can be used in the field to support the decision not to take a low-acuity patient to an ED.
Methods and analysis
All patients in Yorkshire who were transported to the ED by ambulance between July 2019 and February 2020 will be included. Ambulance electronic patient care record (ePCR) clinical data will be used as candidate predictors for the model. These will then be linked to the corresponding ED record, which holds the outcome of a ‘non-urgent attendance’. The estimated sample size is 52,958, with 4767 events and an EPP of 7.48. An XGBoost algorithm will be used for model development. Initially, a model will be derived using all the data and the apparent performance will be assessed. Then internal-external validation will use non-random nested cross-validation (CV) with test sets held out for each ED (spatial validation). After all models are created, a random-effects meta-analysis will be undertaken. This will pool performance measures such as goodness of fit, discrimination and calibration. It will also generate a prediction interval and measure heterogeneity between clusters. The performance of the full model will be updated with the pooled results.
Discussion
Creating a risk prediction model in this area will lead to further development of a clinical decision support tool that ensures every ambulance patient can get to the right place of care, first time. If this study is successful, it could help paramedics evaluate the benefit of transporting a patient to the ED before they leave the scene. It could also reduce congestion in the urgent and emergency care system.
Trial Registration
This study was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN: 12121281
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics
Reference35 articles.
1. National Audit Office. NHS Ambulance services. 2017.
2. Coster JE, Turner JK, Bradbury D, Cantrell A. Why do people choose emergency and urgent care services? A rapid review utilizing a systematic literature search and narrative synthesis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. p. 1137–49. Available from: https://doi.org/onlinelibrary.wile.
3. NHS England [online]. Statistics » Urgent and emergency care daily situation reports. [cited 2021 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/uec-sitrep/
4. Andrew E, Nehme Z, Cameron P, Smith K. Drivers of increasing emergency ambulance demand. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2020; [cited 2020 Dec 4];24(3):385. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ipec20.
5. O’Cathain A, Knowles E, Long J, Connell J, Bishop-Edwards L, Simpson R, et al. Drivers of ‘clinically unnecessary’ use of emergency and urgent care: the DEUCE mixed-methods study. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2020;8(15):1–256. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08150.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献