Abstract
AbstractWhile there has been much discussion of how the scientific establishment’s culture can engender research misconduct and scientific irreproducibility, this has been discussed much less frequently with respect to the medical profession. Here the authors posit that a lack of self-criticism, an encouragement of novel scientific research generated by the recruitment policies of the UK Royal Training Colleges along with insufficient training in the sciences are core reasons as to why research misconduct and dishonesty prevail within the medical community. Furthermore, the UK General Medical Council’s own data demonstrates a historic inattentiveness to the ease with which doctors can engage in research misconduct. Suggestions are made as to how these issues can be investigated and alternative incentives for career advancement are adumbrated.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference55 articles.
1. Siegel D, Baveye P. Battling the paper glut. Science. 2010;329(5998):1466.
2. Biagioli M. Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature. 2016;535(7611):201.
3. The Academy of Medical Sciences. Reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research: improving research practice. www.acmedsci.ac.uk/download.php?f=file&i=32558. Accessed 25 June 2018.
4. The Royal Society. Research culture - Embedding inclusive excellence: Insights on the future culture of research - January 2018. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/Publications/2018/research-culture-workshop-report.pdf. Accessed 21 Sept 2018.
5. Grant RP. Why scientists need to do more about research fraud. The Guardian; 2018.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献