Abstract
AbstractEgypt currently holds the record for the most retractions in the continent of Africa according to the Retraction Watch database, and the 2nd highest of countries in the Middle East. The purpose of this study was to analyse the retracted medical publications from Egyptian affiliations, in order to delineate specific problems and solutions. We examined databases including Pubmed, Google Scholar and others, for all retracted medical publications that were conducted in an Egyptian institution, up to the date of August 31st 2022. We observed for the reason(s) for retraction, number of citations of the retracted work, the length of time between publication and retraction, and where the work was published (journal, publisher and impact factor). 68 retractions were identified. Most retractions were from the speciality of Obstetrics and Gynecology (n = 22), followed by Anesthesia (n = 7). The top 3 reasons for retraction were unreliable results, FFP level misconduct, and duplicate publication. The number of retractions significantly increased over the years, especially in 2022. When taking into account the number of medical publications per institution, the institute with the highest rate of retractions was Mansoura University, while the lowest rate was Cairo University. The number of retracted medical Egyptian publications continues to increase over time, although they represent a small portion of the overall body of Egyptian medical research. Future studies on retracted articles should employ a methodology that considers the institutions where the studies were conducted. This could allow a better understanding of specific problems in certain countries or regions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education
Reference66 articles.
1. Barde, F., Peiffer-Smadja, N., & de La Blanchardière, A. (2020). Fraude scientifique : Une menace majeure pour la recherche médicale. La Revue De Médecine Interne, 41(5), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2020.02.004
2. Baskaran, S., Agarwal, A., Panner Selvam, M. K., Henkel, R., Durairajanayagam, D., Leisegang, K., et al. (2019). Is there plagiarism in the most influential publications in the field of andrology? Andrologia, 51(10), e13405. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13405
3. Benjamin, P. (2019). False Research Results—A Global Problem That Includes the Arab World. https://www.al-fanarmedia.org/2019/07/false-research-results-a-global-problem-that-includes-the-arab-world/
4. Bolland, M. J., Grey, A., & Avenell, A. (2022). Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem. Accountability in Research, 29(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1886933
5. Bordewijk, E. M., Wang, R., Askie, L. M., Gurrin, L. C., Thornton, J. G., van Wely, M., et al. (2020). Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 249, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.016