Value configurations for balancing standardization and customization in chronic care: a qualitative study

Author:

Colldén Christian,Hellström Andreas,Gremyr Ida

Abstract

Abstract Background Demands for both customization and standardization are increasing in healthcare. At the same time, resources are scarce, and healthcare managers are urged to improve efficiency. A framework of three value configurations – shop, chain, and network – has been proposed for how healthcare operations can be designed and organized for efficient value creation. In this paper, use of value configurations for balancing of standardization and customization is explored in the context of care for chronic mental conditions. Methods A typical case is presented to illustrate the manifestations of conflicting demands between customization and standardization, and the potential usefulness of the value configurations framework. Qualitative data were collected from managers and care developers in two focus groups and six semi-structured interviews, completed by a national document describing a care pathway. Data were coded and analysed using an insider-outsider approach. Results Operationalization of the balance between standardization and customization were found to be highly delegated and ad hoc. Also, the conflict between the two demands was often seen as aggravated by scarce resources. Value configurations can be fruitful as a means of discussing and redesigning care operations if applied at a suitable level of abstraction. Applied adequately, all three value configurations were recognized in the care operations for the patient group, with shop as the overarching configuration. Some opportunities for improved efficiency were identified, yet all configurations were seen as vital in the chronic care process. Conclusions The study challenges the earlier proposed organizational separation of care corresponding to different value configurations. Instead, as dual demand for customization and standardization permeates healthcare, parallel but explicated value configurations may be a path to improved quality and efficiency. Combined and intermediate configurations should also be further investigated.

Funder

Chalmers University of Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference60 articles.

1. Mannion R, Exworthy M. (Re) Making the procrustean bed? Standardization and customization as competing logics in healthcare. International Journal of Health Policy and Management [Internet]. 2017;6:301–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.35

2. Mannion R, Exworthy M. Researching the co-existence and continuity of standardization and customization in healthcare: A response to recent commentaries. International Journal of Health Policy and Management [Internet]. 2018;7:572–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.07

3. Andersen H. Enablers for change: A mixed-methods study of Lean-based quality improvement in hospitals. [Tromsø, Norway]; 2015.

4. Lefton R. Reducing variation in healthcare delivery. Healthcare Financial Management. 2008;62:42–5.

5. Pollitt C, Dan S. The impacts of the new public management in Europe: a meta-analysis. COCOPS working paper no. 3. Rotterdam; 2011.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3