Author:
Bourque Michaela A.,Loiselle Carmen G.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Research on patients’ perceptions of cancer care often documents sub-optimal experiences. Cancer care quality issues include restricted service access, lack of care coordination, gaps in follow-up and “generic” rather than person-centered care. Recent reports underscore that proactively and periodically seeking user feedback is crucial for timely care quality improvement. The present study aimed to analyze and thematically organize a large amount of feedback from patients who had been treated for cancer within the last 6 months.
Methods
Randomly selected participants (N = 3,278) from 3 University-affiliated cancer centres in Montreal, Quebec, Canada completed the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) and an open-ended question on their perceptions of the care they received. 692 participants responded to the latter. Guided by the Cancer Experience Measurement Framework (CEMF), their feedback was analyzed using a qualitative thematic approach.
Results
Cancer care perceptions included sub-themes of care access and coordination, continuity/transition, and perceived appropriateness/personalisation of care.
The most salient theme was captured by care access and coordination with 284 comments (44%) directly addressing these issues. The ways in which health care services were structured including setting, schedule, and location were often raised as cause for concerns. Issues surrounding cancer information/education, emotional support, and physical comfort were frequently reported as unmet needs. In addition, limited access to cancer services led patients to seek alternatives such as going to emergency departments and/or private care.
Conclusions
These findings are timely as they show that most patients are well aware of quality issues in cancer care and are willing to report candidly on these. Patient feedback also underscore the importance for cancer care institutions to periodically gather patient-reported data so that systems can re-calibrate their service offerings according to these data. Ultimately, patient reports will translate into enhanced quality, personalization, and safer cancer care provision.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Balogh EP, Ganz PA, Murphy SB, Nass SJ, Ferrell BR, Stovall E. Patient-centered cancer treatment planning: improving the quality of oncology care. Summary of an institute of medicine workshop. The Oncologist. 2011;16(12):1800–5. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0252.
2. Bracher M, D. J., & Wagland, R. Exploring experiences of cancer care in Wales: a thematic analysis of free-text responses to the 2013 Wales cancer patient experience survey (wcpes). BMJ Open. 2016;6(9): 011830. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011830.
3. Bridge E, Conn LG, Dhanju S, Singh S, Moody L. The patient experience of ambulatory cancer treatment: a descriptive study. Curr Oncol. 2019;26(4):e482–93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4191.
4. Gillespie H, Kelly M, Gormley G, King N, Gilliland D, Dornan T. How can tomorrow’s doctors be more caring? A phenomenological investigation Med Educ. 2018;52(10):1052–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13684.
5. Coalition Priorité Cancer Quebec. (2020). The impact of the measures implemented to counter the covid-19 pandemic on oncology patients. https://coalitioncancer.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/FINAL_REPORT_COVID-CANCER-JUNE2020.pdf
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献