Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To explore health care professionals’ (HCPs) perspectives, experiences and preferences towards digital technology use in routine palliative care delivery.
Methods
HCPs (n = 19) purposively selected from a sample of settings that reflect routine palliative care delivery (i.e. specialized outpatient palliative care, inpatient palliative care, inpatient hospice care in both rural and urban areas of the German states of Brandenburg and Berlin) participated in an explorative, qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Interview data were analyzed using structured qualitative content analysis.
Results
Digital technologies are widely used in routine palliative care and are well accepted by HCPs. Central functions of digital technologies as experienced in palliative care are coordination of work processes, patient-centered care, and communication. Especially in outpatient care, they facilitate overcoming spatial and temporal distances. HCPs attribute various benefits to digital technologies that contribute to better coordinated, faster, more responsive, and overall more effective palliative care. Simultaneously, participants preferred technology as an enhancement not replacement of care delivery. HCPs fear that digital technologies, if overused, will contribute to dehumanization and thus significantly reduce the quality of palliative care.
Conclusion
Digital technology is already an essential part of routine palliative care delivery. While generally perceived as useful by HCPs, digital technologies are considered as having limitations and carrying risks. Hence, their use and consequences must be carefully considered, as they should discreetly complement but not replace human interaction in palliative care delivery.
Funder
Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg CAMPUS gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. World Health Organization. National cancer control programmes: policies and managerial guidelines. 2nd ed. Geneva; 2002. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42494 . Accessed 11 Oct 2022.
2. Connor SR, editor. Global atlas of palliative care. 2nd ed. London; 2020. Available from: http://www.thewhpca.org/resources/global-atlas-on-end-of-life-care . Accessed 29 June 2022.
3. Radbruch L, Andersohn F, Walker J. Überversorgung kurativ — Unterversorgung palliativ? Analyse ausgewählter Behandlungen am Lebensende. Palliativversorgung (Modul 3). [Overuse curative - underuse palliative? Analysis of selected treatments at the end of life. Palliative care (Module 3).] In: Bertelsmann Stiftung, editor. Faktencheck Gesundheit. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann; 2015. Available from: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/de/publikationen/publikation/did/faktencheck-palliativversorgung-modul-3 . Accessed 11 Oct 2022.
4. Simon ST, Pralong A, Welling U. Versorgungsstrukturen in der Palliativmedizin: Behandlungspfad für Patienten mit einer nichtheilbaren Krebserkrankung. [Healthcare structures in palliative care medicine: Flowchart for patients with incurable cancer]. Internist. 2016;57:953–58.
5. Gothe H, Brinkmann C, Schmedt N, et al. Is there an unmet medical need for palliative care services in Germany? Incidence, prevalence, and 1-year all-cause mortality of palliative care sensitive conditions: real-world evidence based on German claims data. J Public Health (Berl ). 2022;30:711–20.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献