Author:
Chen Hui,Yu Qian,Xie Jianfeng,Liu Songqiao,Pan Chun,Liu Ling,Huang Yingzi,Guo Fengmei,Qiu Haibo,Yang Yi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Previously identified phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been limited by a disregard for temporal dynamics. We aimed to identify longitudinal phenotypes in ARDS to test the prognostic and predictive enrichment of longitudinal phenotypes, and to develop simplified models for phenotype identification.
Methods
We conducted a multi-database study based on the Chinese Database in Intensive Care (CDIC) and four ARDS randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We employed latent class analysis (LCA) to identify longitudinal phenotypes using 24-hourly data from the first four days of invasive ventilation. We used the Cox regression model to explore the association between time-varying respiratory parameters and 28-day mortality across phenotypes. Phenotypes were validated in four RCTs, and the heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) was investigated. We also constructed two multinomial logistical regression analyses to develop the probabilistic models.
Findings
A total of 605 ARDS patients in CDIC were enrolled. The three-class LCA model was identified and had the optimal fit, as follows: Class 1 (n = 400, 66.1% of the cohort) was the largest phenotype over all study days, and had fewer abnormal values, less organ dysfunction and the lowest 28-day mortality rate (30.5%). Class 2 (n = 102, 16.9% of the cohort) was characterized by pulmonary mechanical dysfunction and had the highest proportion of poorly aerated lung volume, the 28-day mortality rate was 47.1%. Class 3 (n = 103, 17% of the cohort) was correlated with extra-pulmonary dysfunction and had the highest 28-day mortality rate (56.3%). Time-varying mechanical power was more significantly associated with 28-day mortality in Class 2 patients compared to other phenotypes. Similar phenotypes were identified in four RCTs. A significant HTE between phenotypes and treatment strategies was observed in the ALVEOLI (high PEEP vs. low PEEP) and the FACTT trials (conservative vs. liberal fluid management). Two parsimonious probabilistic models were constructed to identify longitudinal phenotypes.
Interpretation
We identified and validated three novel longitudinal phenotypes for ARDS patients, with both prognostic and predictive enrichment. The phenotypes of ARDS can be accurately identified with simple classifier models, except for Class 3.
Funder
Yilu “Gexin”—Fluid Therapy Research Fund Project
The Key Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.
2. Meyer NJ, Gattinoni L, Calfee CS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2021;398(10300):622–37.
3. McNicholas B, Madden MG, Laffey JG. Machine learning classifier models: the future for acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotyping? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(7):919–20.
4. Matthay MA, Arabi YM, Siegel ER, Ware LB, Bos LDJ, Sinha P, Beitler JR, Wick KD, Curley MAQ, Constantin JM, et al. Phenotypes and personalized medicine in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2136–52.
5. Sinha P, Calfee CS. Phenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: moving towards precision medicine. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25(1):12–20.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献