Nursing student’s satisfaction with two methods of CBL and lecture-based learning

Author:

Shohani Masoumeh,Bastami Mohammadreza,Gheshlaghi Leili Abedi,Nasrollahi Abbas

Abstract

Abstract Background Case-based learning (CBL) is an effective teaching–learning strategy that provides a learning environment similar to actual practice. The aim of the present study was to determine the nursing student's satisfaction with two methods of CBL and lecture-based learning. Methods This descriptive observational study was conducted in 2019 in School of Nursing and Midwifery in Ilam. All 128 undergraduate nursing students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th semesters of nursing were enrolled in the study to compare students' satisfaction with CBL and lecture-based learning. Data collection tools included a demographic information questionnaire and a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of 20 questions based on the Likert scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 22. Results More than two thirds of the students (81.3%) found the CBL method was better than lectures. 60% of male students and 62% of female students stated that the CBL method increased their self-confidence compared to the traditional lecture-based learning (p < 0.03). Students were very satisfied with the CBL method (9.1 ± 1.1 out of 10). There was no significant relationship between gender-related features, and the mean score of students' satisfaction with the CBL method (p > 0.05). However, 4th semester students were more satisfied than other students (P = 0.02). Conclusion The results show that CBL, as a teaching–learning technique in specialized nursing courses, increases students' satisfaction and self-confidence compared to lecture.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Ross MET, Otto DA, Helton AS. Benefits of simulation and role-playing to teach performance of functional assessments. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2017;38(1):47–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000095.

2. Pakpour V, Mehrdad N, Salimi S, Moghadam M. Nursing student satisfaction from Iran university of medical sciences clinical learning environment. Educational development of jundishapur. 2016;6(4):356–63.

3. Hamiti M, Reka B, Imeri F. The impact of computer components in enhancing the quality of teaching and learning process in universities. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;191:2422–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.564.

4. Schwartzstein RM, Roberts DH. Saying goodbye to lectures in medical school - paradigm shift or passing fad? N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):605–7.

5. Vaezi A, Azizian F, Kopayehzadeh J. Survey compare team based learning and lecture teaching method, on learning-teaching process nursing student’s, in Surgical and Internal Diseases course. The Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2015;10(3):246–54.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3